Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 27;99(6):1203–1212. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm067

Table 1.

Results of an ANOVA on the full dataset (all three experimental set-ups)

experiment Site Network (site) Quadrat (network, site) experiment × site experiment × network (site) experiment × quadrat (network, site)
Variables F P > F F P > F F P > F F P > F F P > F F P > F F P > F
Nleav 2·54 0·1392 0·42 0·7906 1·01 0·4892 1·85 0·1192 2·44 0·0412 0·91 0·5539 5·50 <0·0001
Nflw 0·81 0·4730 1·18 0·3807 2·53 0·1046 1·79 0·1190 1·70 0·1534 1·20 0·3496 1·86 0·0144
Nak 0·46 0·6555 0·38 0·8204 0·68 0·6701 2·28 0·502 2·92 0·0371 1·22 0·3418 2·65 0·0005
Hind 17·93 0·0011 2·99 0·0728 1·20 0·3893 1·80 0·1290 3·42 0·0103 1·29 0·3012 5·78 <0·0001
Diam 7·59 0·0137 0·96 0·4785 0·88 0·5453 1·68 0·1594 1·88 0·1145 1·33 0·2796 3·87 <0·0001
s/I 1·02 0·4230 1·31 0·3364 0·71 0·6508 2·17 0·780 1·68 0·1812 0·96 0·5116 3·17 <0·0001

Traits are abbreviated as follows: Diam, stem diameter; Height, maximum height of individuals; Nleav, number of leaves; Nak, number of akenes; Nflw, number of flowers; s/I, total number of seeds per individual.

The significant P-values after sequential Simes corrections at the significance level α (5 %) are in bold.