Table 2.
Results of an ANOVA on each experimental set-up
| Year/experiment | Effects | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Network (site) | Quadrat (network, site) | |||||
| Variables | F | P > F | F | P > F | F | P > F | |
| 2004/in situ | Nleav | 3·31 | 0·0714 | 3·84 | 0·0299 | 1·89 | 0·0458 |
| Nflw | 2·60 | 0·0984 | 1·51 | 0·2700 | 3·03 | 0·0012 | |
| Nak | 1·35 | 0·3274 | 2·86 | 0·0713 | 3·45 | 0·0006 | |
| Hind | 17·51 | <0·0001 | 0·83 | 0·5697 | 8·22 | <0·0001 | |
| Diam | 5·66 | 0·0185 | 3·63 | 0·0355 | 1·66 | 0·0903 | |
| s/I | 2·59 | 0·1106 | 2·65 | 0·0830 | 3·53 | 0·0004 | |
| 2005/in situ | Nleav | 1·33 | 0·3064 | 0·59 | 0·7334 | 16·84 | <0·0001 |
| Nflw | 1·57 | 0·2594 | 1·75 | 0·2180 | 5·66 | <0·0001 | |
| Nak | 1·99 | 0·1936 | 2·07 | 0·1801 | 7·19 | <0·0001 | |
| Hind | 3·98 | 0·0337 | 1·32 | 0·3404 | 14·17 | <0·0001 | |
| Diam | 1·26 | 0·3367 | 0·86 | 0·5595 | 10·43 | <0·0001 | |
| s/I | 1·63 | 0·2530 | 1·50 | 0·3001 | 8·72 | <0·0001 | |
| 2005/ex situ | Nleav | 3·36 | 0·0379 | 0·63 | 0·7039 | 1·72 | 0·0737 |
| Nflw | 0·37 | 0·8265 | 1·72 | 0·1735 | 1·21 | 0·2947 | |
| Nak | 1·82 | 0·3675 | 0·67 | 0·6503 | 1·07 | 0·3963 | |
| Hind | 0·59 | 0·6796 | 2·24 | 0·1181 | 2·53 | 0·0059 | |
| Diam | 1·92 | 0·1787 | 0·92 | 0·5130 | 1·77 | 0·0638 | |
| s/I | 1·34 | 0·5614 | 0·29 | 0·9120 | 1·28 | 0·2685 | |
| %Ger | 2·44 | 0·0908 | 0·29 | 0·9308 | 2·99 | 0·0026 | |
Traits are abbreviated as follows: Diam, stem diameter; Height, maximum height of individuals; Nleav, number of leaves; Nak, number of achenes; Nflw, number of flowers; s/I, total number of seeds per individual and %Ger, percentage of germination per pot.
The significant P-values after sequential Simes corrections at the significance level α (5 %) are in bold.