Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 27;99(6):1203–1212. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm067

Table 3.

Distribution of environmental variables across puddles in 2004 and 2005

Environmental variables 2004 2005 Difference
% connected puddles 0·71 0·71 n.s.
% puddles with tracks 0·76 0·80 n.s.
% dried puddles 0·57 0·50 n.s.
Vegetation cover 0·43 0·52 0·05 0·55 0·40 0·05 n.s.
Sunlight intensity 0 0·33 0·67 0·05 0·60 0·35 n.s.
Mean number of connections§ 3·8 ± 2·8 2·2 ± 0·4 n.s.
Mean plant density 97·4 ± 73·2 52 ± 48·7 *

The environmental variables are the connection status (% of connected puddles), indication of animal or human disturbance (% of puddles with tracks), presence of water (% of dried puddles), ground vegetation cover, sunlight intensity, mean number of connections and mean plant density per quadrat (the asterisk indicates a significant difference between the 2 years, P < 0·05).

In 2005, one puddle went extinct and environmental data were not recorded.

Distribution of vegetation cover across puddles, with three classes: low, medium and high.

Distribution of sunlight intensity across puddles, with three classes: low, medium and high.

§ For connected puddles only.