Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec;72(6):948–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04039.x

Table 3.

Final parameter estimates and effect of genetic and clinical factors on tacrolimus CL/F

Study population1 Bootstrap analysis2
Parameter Estimate (%RSE)3 95% CI4 Median 2.5th–97.5th percentiles
Tacrolimus CL/F5 38.4 (4.14) 35.3, 41.5 38.3 35.5, 41.7
Factors affecting CL/F
6–10 DPT6 0.86 (4.13) 0.80, 0.93 0.86 0.80, 0.93
11–180 DPT6 0.71 (4.14) 0.66, 0.77 0.72 0.66, 0.77
CYP3A5*1/*3 1.70 (3.99) 1.56, 1.82 1.69 1.56, 1.82
CYP3A5*1/*1 2.00 (5.90) 1.77, 2.23 1.99 1.77, 2.23
Steroid sparing centre 0.70 (3.50) 0.65, 0.75 0.70 0.65, 0.75
(Age/50)θ −0.40 (13.5) −0.50, −0.30 −0.39 −0.50, −0.29
CCB use7 0.94 (2.43) 0.89, 0.98 0.94 0.90, 0.99
IIV8 for CL/F, %CV 40.1 37.4, 43.6 40.0 37.4, 43.6
RUV9, additive, SD 3.19 3.07, 3.32 3.19 3.08, 3.32
1

681 patients analysed in this study

2

results from 989 bootstrap runs with successful convergence and successful covariance step

3

per cent relative standard error

4

confidence interval: estimate ± (1.96*standard error of estimate)

5

typical value of CL/F in l h−1

6

days post transplant

7

calcium channel blocker use at the time of trough measurement

8

inter-individual variability

9

random unexplained variability.