Table 3.
Study population1 | Bootstrap analysis2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Estimate (%RSE)3 | 95% CI4 | Median | 2.5th–97.5th percentiles |
Tacrolimus CL/F5 | 38.4 (4.14) | 35.3, 41.5 | 38.3 | 35.5, 41.7 |
Factors affecting CL/F | ||||
6–10 DPT6 | 0.86 (4.13) | 0.80, 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.80, 0.93 |
11–180 DPT6 | 0.71 (4.14) | 0.66, 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.66, 0.77 |
CYP3A5*1/*3 | 1.70 (3.99) | 1.56, 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.56, 1.82 |
CYP3A5*1/*1 | 2.00 (5.90) | 1.77, 2.23 | 1.99 | 1.77, 2.23 |
Steroid sparing centre | 0.70 (3.50) | 0.65, 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.65, 0.75 |
(Age/50)θ | −0.40 (13.5) | −0.50, −0.30 | −0.39 | −0.50, −0.29 |
CCB use7 | 0.94 (2.43) | 0.89, 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.90, 0.99 |
IIV8 for CL/F, %CV | 40.1 | 37.4, 43.6 | 40.0 | 37.4, 43.6 |
RUV9, additive, SD | 3.19 | 3.07, 3.32 | 3.19 | 3.08, 3.32 |
681 patients analysed in this study
results from 989 bootstrap runs with successful convergence and successful covariance step
per cent relative standard error
confidence interval: estimate ± (1.96*standard error of estimate)
typical value of CL/F in l h−1
days post transplant
calcium channel blocker use at the time of trough measurement
inter-individual variability
random unexplained variability.