Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 20;1(2):e000303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000303

Table 2.

Proportions of GPs who felt that the national guidelines had facilitated their contacts with different actors

Do the new national guidelines for sickness certification facilitate your contacts with…*
…patients?*
…the SIO?
…the healthcare staff?
…the patients' workplaces or employment office?§
n=1766
n=1163
n=789
n=805
% PR 95% CI % PR 95% CI % PR 95% CI % PR 95% CI
All GPs 65.4 43.5 29.4 30.2
Educational level
 Specialist 61.4 1 40.3 1 25.9 1 27.0 1
 In resident training 70.8 1.15 1.03 to 1.29 46.9 1.17 1.01 to 1.34 34.0 1.31 1.11 to 1.56 34.8 1.29 1.09 to 1.52
 Registered physician 70.6 1.15 0.92 to 1.44 46.5 1.15 0.87 to 1.53 43.8 1.69 1.26 to 2.27 34.5 1.28 0.92 to 1.77
 Medical degree 87.3 1.42 1.20 to 1.69 65.1 1.62 1.32 to 1.98 43.5 1.68 1.32 to 2.15 46.7 1.73 1.37 to 2.20
Frequency of GPs' consultations involving sickness certification
 >5 Times a week 59.5 1 37.0 1 25.0 1 25.5 1
 1–5 Times a week 69.2 1.16 1.05 to 1.28 47.3 1.28 1.13 to 1.45 31.8 1.27 1.10 to 1.47 33.2 1.30 1.13 to 1.51
 <1 Time a week 75.2 1.26 1.01 to 1.58 61.1 1.65 1.28 to 2.13 44.7 1.79 1.33 to 2.41 38.8 1.52 1.11 to 2.08

Data are presented as prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% CI.

*

No response from 101 (3%) GPs, and 380 (12%) GPs did not use the guidelines.

No response from 127 (4%) GPs, and 380 (12%) GPs did not use the guidelines.

No response from 120 (4%) GPs, and 380 (12%) GPs did not use the guidelines.

§

No response from 133 (4%) GPs, and 380 (12%) GPs did not use the guidelines.

GPs, general practitioners; SIO, social insurance office.