Table 1.
Studies evaluating the potential prognostic significance of TET2 mutations in patients with myeloid malignancies
Disease | Reference | Patients studied | Prognostic relevance |
---|---|---|---|
AML | (Abdel-Wahab et al., 2009) | 119 AML patients including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, and AML with an antecedent hematologic disorder | TET2 mutations were associated with significantly worsened overall survival. |
AML | (Nibourel et al., 2010) | 111 patients with de novo AML | TET2 mutations did not impact overall survival. |
AML | (Metzeler et al., 2011) | 427 patients with normal karyotype AML | TET2 mutations were associated with a lower complete remission rate and shorter disease free and overall survival. |
Secondary AML | (Kosmider et al., 2011) | 247 patients with AML derived from MDS or therapy-related AML | TET2 mutations did not influence complete remission rates or overall survival. |
MDS | (Kosmider et al., 2009a) | 89 MDS patients and 7 with MDS transformed to AML | TET2 mutations associated with a significantly improved overall and progression-free survival. |
MDS | (Bejar et al., 2011) | 439 de novo MDS patients | TET2 mutations did not impact overall survival or effect clinical characteristics in an adverse way. |
MPN | (Tefferi et al., 2009) | 239 BCR-ABL negative MPN patients | TET2 mutations did not impact overall survival or effect clinical characteristics in an adverse way. |
CMML | (Kosmider et al., 2009b) | 88 patients with CMML | TET2 mutations strongly associated with monocytosis. In the overall cohort, TET2 mutations did impact survival but TET2 imparted significantly worse overall survival in patients with CMML I specifically. |