Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 8;28(1):63–68. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr616

Table 2.

Comparison of Spearman's correlation coefficients between four different expression measures (RPKM, mseq, GPseq and POME) on transcripts with high over-dispersion and high spatial dependence in 12 real datasets

Sample Na RPKM mseq GPseq POME
LnCaP_0 1495 0.6454 0.6232 0.6071 0.7362
LnCaP_24 1534 0.6248 0.5990 0.5828 0.7118
LnCaP_48 1518 0.6059 0.5963 0.5152 0.6795
VCaP_0 1525 0.6641 0.6452 0.6496 0.7106
VCaP_24 1523 0.6259 0.5783 0.6691 0.6841
VCaP_48 1500 0.6354 0.5094 0.6820 0.7022
aT34 1563 0.6705 0.6470 0.5214 0.6914
aT34N 1476 0.6322 0.6268 0.6203 0.6523
DU145F 1525 0.6254 0.6017 0.5326 0.6749
DU145F2 1529 0.6239 0.5984 0.5375 0.6809
VCaP 1689 0.6211 0.5534 0.4853 0.6301
RWPE 1548 0.6250 0.6079 0.5173 0.6730

In each dataset, the method with the highest Spearman's correlation coefficient is highlighted in bold.

aThe number of transcripts measured in Illumina sequencing with high over-dispersion and high spatial dependence.