Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 22;6(12):e28913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028913

Table 2. Microsatellite loci used in this study [44].

All Hawai'i Indo-Pacific
Locus N A N A H O H E N A H O H E
Pfi1.3A 22 17 0.661 0.682 16 0.472 0.621
Pfi1.5C 14 7 0.520 0.515 14 0.495 0.565
Pfi1.6B2 8 5 0.159 0.157 7 0.252 0.271
Pfi1.9C 13 11 0.668 0.682 11 0.603 0.680
Pfi2.1D 18 13 0.483 0.475 17 0.668 0.706
Pfi2.8A 10 6 0.324 0.332 9 0.286 0.299
Pfi2.8E 13 7 0.517 0.534 11 0.600 0.626
Pfi2.9C 20 12 0.649 0.705 20 0.768 0.848
Pfi4A 32 20 0.543 0.510 29 0.667 0.733
Pfi1.6B3 4 4 0.164 0.160
Pfi2D 3 3 0.189 0.199
Pfi2.12F 15 15 0.562 0.569
Pfi2.2E 11 11 0.356 0.357

Locus name, number of alleles (N A), observed (H O), and expected heterozygosity (H E), are listed for each locus for the Hawai'i samples (N = 775, 13 loci) and the Indo-Pacific (N = 417, includes the Hawaiian subsample, 9 loci). The number of alleles is also listed for the entire dataset (N = 1,117). Loci in italics excluded from analyses due to linkage disequilibrium (see Results).