Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 23;2:376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00376

Table 4.

Normalized frequency counts for the verb forms and adverbs in our materials averaged across the items.

European Parliament (25–30M) Cosmas II (2000M) deWac (1411M) Google set to 1 DLex (100M)
Past tense verb forms 0.091 3.787 0.032 37175.20 8.034
Present tense verb forms 1.123 5.439 0.034 105627.80 3.498
Verb difference scores −1.032 −1.652 −0.002 −68452.6 4.536
lower/upper 95 CI of the difference scores −2.779/0.715 −5.843/2.541 −0.0171/0.0130 −247001.4/110096.2 −1.750/10.822
Adverbs indicating the past 58.879 27.774 0.183 417298.0 18.680
Adverbs indicating the future 11.537 17.012 0.184 421338.4 23.805
Adverb difference scores 47.343 10.762 −0.001 −4040.404 −5.125
lower/upper 95 CI of the difference scores 1.126/93.559 −20.667/42.191 −0.239/0.237 −528146.7/520065.9 −45.065/34.815

“Past tense verb forms” and “present tense verb forms” indicate the averaged and normalized frequencies for the recent and future conditions respectively. “Adverbs indicating the past” and “adverbs indicating the future” present the averaged and normalized frequency averages across the adverbs used in the recent and future conditions. “Verb difference scores” and “Adverb difference scores” present the results for subtracting the scores for verbs/adverbs in the future from those for verbs/adverbs in the recent condition. Negative difference scores indicate lower frequencies for the past than present tense verbs and the adverbs. For each corpus we show the number of tokens in millions (M) in brackets. For the verb and adverb difference scores we list first the lower and then the upper 95 percent confidence interval.