Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005 May;29(1):26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.12.008

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Behavioral recovery from SCI in gfap∷NgR(310)ecto-transgenic mice. (A and B) Locomotor BBB score is reported as a function of time after dorsal over-hemisection in mice injured at 2 months of age (A) from WT (n = 9 mice), Line 08 (n = 9) or Line 01 (n = 7) or mice injured at 4–6 months of age (B; WT, n = 8; Tg, n = 11). For the specific mice in which tissue sparing was measured in Fig. 5F, the results were indistinguishable. For example, the 21-day BBB wild-type score was 12.2 ± 0.9 and the Tg08 score was 16.2 ± 0.2 (P < 0.01). (C) The maximal tolerated inclined plane angle is plotted as a function of time after SCI for WT (n = 9 mice) and transgenic (n = 9 mice) animals injured at 2 months of age. (D) Hindlimb errors during inclined grid climbing are reported as a function of post-SCI time from both groups (n = 9 mice in each group, age 2 months). In all the graphs, means ± SEM are reported. The values from transgenic group are statistically different from the WT mice (**P < 0.01; Student’s t test).