Table 3.

One-way MANOVA results for the resting and reference (averaged across all three stimulus types) θ power with group as the between-subject variables and one-way MANOVA results for the θ power with condition (resting vs. task reference) as the repeated-measures independent variable and with groups pooled. Post-hoc ANOVAs results for each of the dependent variables taken on their own is shown below the overall MANOVA.

	Resting Condition		Effect Sizes (% of Variance)
	NAC	LTAA	Group
Resting θ Power 1-Way MANOVA			5.4
Rest θ Power at Fz	0.791	0.698	4.7
Rest θ Power at FCz	0.812	0.706	4.7
Rest θ Power at Cz	0.767	0.603	3.3
Rest θ Power at CPz	0.708	0.646	0.7
Rest θ Power at Pz	0.758	0.657	4.7
	Task Condition		Effect Sizes (% of Variance)
	NAC	LTAA
Reference θ Power 1-Way MANOVA			17.1**
Ref θ Power at Fz	0.930	0.819	6.8**
Ref θ Power at FCz	0.973	0.846	10.8***
Ref θ Power at Cz	0.948	0.821	10.9***
Ref θ Power at CPz	0.921	0.800	10.2**
Ref θ Power at Pz	0.891	0.770	10.4***
	Resting Condition	Task Condition	Effect Sizes (% of Variance) Condition
θ Power 1-Way MANOVA			48.4***
θ Power at Fz	0.745	0.875	42.8***
θ Power at FCz	0.759	0.909	35.2***
θ Power at Cz	0.685	0.885	18.2***
θ Power at CPz	0.677	0.860	20.2***
θ Power at Pz	0.708	0.830	29.5***

Effect is significant:

^*p ≤ 0.05;

^**p ≤ 0.01;

^***p ≤ 0.001.