Table 3.

MANOVA results for the between-group analyses of each of the ERO_EVK power measures (δ_1, δ_2, θ₁, θ₂ and α) with the multiple dependent variables taken as the particular log-transformed ERO_EVK power measure at the midline electrodes Fz, FCz, Cz, CPz and Pz. Follow-up univariate ANOVAs with each of the dependent variables taken independently and follow-up discriminant analysis with the dependent variables taken as the predictors in the discriminant function are shown for MANOVAs where the group effect is significant at p < 0.05.

Evoked ERO Power Measures	Model: log(Fz), log(FCz), log(Cz), log(PCz), log(Pz) Group (N = 96; 48 NACs, 48 LTAAs) MANOVA: Error df =90
EROEVK power
δ1 (1–2 Hz, 300–700ms)
MANOVA	df		Pillai-Bartlett Trace	F-value
	5		.147	3.098*
MANOVA Follow-up Analyses
Univariate ANOVAs
Dependant Variables showing significance	df	Controls Mean Log Power	LTAAs Mean Log Power	Effect Size (% Variance) Group
δ1 EROEVK power at Fz		0.380	0.372	0.0
δ1 EROEVK power at FCz		0.522	0.387	2.8
δ1 EROEVK power at Cz	1	0.640	0.443	4.8*
δ1 EROEVK power at CPz	1	0.758	0.539	6.3*
δ1 EROEVK power at Pz	1	0.808	0.533	9.9**
Discriminant Analysis			Wilks’ Lambda	% Classification Accuracy
			0.853*	64.6
Predictors		Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients
δ1 EROEVK power at Fz			−1.04
δ1 EROEVK powerat FCz			1.27
δ1 EROEVK power at Cz			−0.21
δ1 EROEVK power at CPz			−0.99
δ1 EROEVK power at Pz			1.55
EROEVK power
δ2 (3-3 Hz, 300–700ms)
MANOVA	df		Pillai-Bartlett Trace	F-value
	5		.094	1.858
EROEVK power
⊖1 (4–5 Hz, 200–500ms)
MANOVA	df		Pillai-Bartlett Trace	F-value
	5		.082	1.608
EROEVK power
⊖2 (6–7 Hz, 200–400ms)
MANOVA	df		Pillai-Bartlett Trace	F-value
	5		.086	1.699
EROEVK power
α(8–12 Hz, 100–300ms)
MANOVA	df		Pillai-Bartlett Trace	F-value
	5		.064	1.221

Effect is significant:

^*p ≤ 0.05;

^**p ≤ 0.01;

^***p ≤ 0.001.