Table 1.
Relationship between the number of AMG and PMG during stage 11
# of AMG | n | AMG/segment | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total AMG | 257 | 48 | 5.4 ± 1.4 | -- |
AMG from same segment | ||||
2 PMG | 57 | 11 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 0.71 |
3 PMG | 91 | 18 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 0.45 |
4 PMG | 72 | 12 | 6.0 ± 1.9 | 0.29 |
> 4 PMG | 37 | 7 | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 0.97 |
AMG from next posterior segment | ||||
2 PMG | 45 | 8 | 5.6 ± 1.2 | 0.62 |
3 PMG | 56 | 12 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 0.13 |
4 PMG | 40 | 8 | 5.0 ± 1.7 | 0.53 |
> 4 PMG | 25 | 4 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | 0.25 |
The top row (Total AMG) indicates the total number of AMG and mean AMG/segment counted from 48 segments (n). AMG from same segment – the number of AMG were counted in 48 segments that contained varying numbers of PMG. For each group differing in PMG number, the mean, standard deviation, and P-value were calculated for the number of AMG present in the same segments. AMG from next posterior segment – 32 segments had an adjacent posterior segment. For each group differing in PMG number, the mean, standard deviation, and P-value were calculated for the number of AMG present in the next posterior segments. The Student’s t-test with a 2-tailed distribution was used to compare the mean AMG/segment between each experimental class and the total mean AMG. None of the experimental values differed significantly from the total AMG mean.