Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2011 Oct 26;361(2):232–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.024

Table 1.

Relationship between the number of AMG and PMG during stage 11

# of AMG n AMG/segment P-value

Total AMG 257 48 5.4 ± 1.4 --
AMG from same segment
 2 PMG 57 11 5.2 ± 1.1 0.71
 3 PMG 91 18 5.1 ± 1.3 0.45
 4 PMG 72 12 6.0 ± 1.9 0.29
 > 4 PMG 37 7 5.3 ± 1.4 0.97
AMG from next posterior segment
 2 PMG 45 8 5.6 ± 1.2 0.62
 3 PMG 56 12 4.7 ± 1.0 0.13
 4 PMG 40 8 5.0 ± 1.7 0.53
 > 4 PMG 25 4 6.3 ± 1.7 0.25

The top row (Total AMG) indicates the total number of AMG and mean AMG/segment counted from 48 segments (n). AMG from same segment – the number of AMG were counted in 48 segments that contained varying numbers of PMG. For each group differing in PMG number, the mean, standard deviation, and P-value were calculated for the number of AMG present in the same segments. AMG from next posterior segment – 32 segments had an adjacent posterior segment. For each group differing in PMG number, the mean, standard deviation, and P-value were calculated for the number of AMG present in the next posterior segments. The Student’s t-test with a 2-tailed distribution was used to compare the mean AMG/segment between each experimental class and the total mean AMG. None of the experimental values differed significantly from the total AMG mean.