Table 2.
Characteristic | n (%) |
---|---|
Group | |
relapse prevention | 14 (67) |
treatment as usual | 7 (33) |
Sex | |
female | 13 (62) |
male | 8 (38) |
Age (years) | mean 47 (range 24-63) |
Deprivation indices of work place** | |
lower quartile (least deprived) | 3 (14) |
mid lower quartile | 4 (19) |
mid upper quartile | 6 (29) |
upper quartile (most deprived) | 8 (38) |
Employment status | |
unemployed | 10 (47) |
part or full-time employed | 7 (33) |
retired student |
2 (10) 2 (10) |
No. of previous episodes | |
Depression (n = 21) | |
0-2 | 5 (24) |
3-5 | 0 (0) |
6-10 | 1 (5) |
11-20 | 4 (19) |
>20 | 5 (23) |
unknown | 6 (29) |
Mania (n = 21) | |
0-2 | 3 (14) |
3-5 | 4 (19) |
6-10 | 2 (11) |
11-20 | 3 (14) |
>20 | 4 (19) |
unknown | 5 (23) |
Years since first episode | mean 21 (range 1-46) |
Relapsed since RP intervention* | |
Relapse Prevention | |
Yes | 6 (43) |
No | 8 (57) |
Treatment as Usual | |
Yes | 2 (29) |
No | 5 (71) |
*At time of interview
**Postcodes were converted into Townsend deprivation indices [24] and categorized into bands in accordance with deprivation indices for England.