Table 4.
For relatives | For Service Users | For care coordinators | |
---|---|---|---|
Value | • Increases understanding of bipolar disorder, triggers and EWS • Gives relatives a role - empowering • Recognize need to seek help earlier - important in a crisis • Improves relationship with service users • Improves relationship with mental health services |
• Provide insight into triggers and EWS • Another 'pair of eyes' to recognize EWS and triggers • Increased support during a crisis • Improves relationship with relative |
• Provide insight into triggers and EWS • Another 'pair of eyes' to monitor service user • Improves contact during a crisis • Improves relationship with relative |
Barriers | • Conflict with work and other commitments • No suitable relative to take part • Not wanting to intrude on relationship between Service User and Care coordinator |
• Want to keep illness and issues private from family • Want to keep family issues private from CC • Did not want to burden family members • Fear increased monitoring will lead to increase misattribution of normal emotions and behaviors • Concern over placing relatives in position of power • Families were a source of stress and trigger to relapse • Relationship with CC is exclusive from relatives |
• Takes longer • Informal increase of caseload • Have to maintain confidentiality of service user • Difficulty dealing with family dynamic within sessions • Unconfident as therapists |