Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Nov;27(6):519–527. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31822ce6c9

Table 3. First-year outcomes in 347 heart transplant patients by donor-recipient gender group.

Outcome Group 1a
(N = 273)
Group 2a
(N = 40)
Group 3a
(N = 34)
χ2 or
Fb
Pc
Deaths 38 (13.9) 8 (20.0) 6 (17.6) 1.39 .498
Severe renal dysfunctiond 93 (34.1) 19 (47.5) 6 (17.6) 8.51 .014
Steroid-induced diabetes 26 (9.5) 4 (10.0) 3 (8.8) 0.59 .744
CAV 19 (7.0) 3 (7.5) 4 (11.8) 0.07 .966
Non-skin cancers 10 (3.7) 0 2 (5.9) 5.48 .065
HT length of stay (days)e 20 ± 18 23 ± 14 18 ± 9 0.73 .571
Number of days rehospitalizede 23 ± 25 19 ± 19 38 ± 38 3.76 .005
Number of treated rejections 2.9 ± 2.7 2.3 ± 2.6 4.2 ± 3.7 4.11 .003
Number of IV-treated infections 1.5 ± 2.3 1.6 ± 3.1 1.5 ± 1.7 0.61 .652

CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy; HT, heart transplant; IV, intravenously.

a

Group 1: same gender donor-recipient; Group 2: female donor-male recipient; Group 3: male donor-female recipient.

b

Logistic regression (χ2), adjusting for patient age at HT and donor age, was used for dichotomous outcomes, which are expressed as N (%); MANCOVA (F), adjusting for patient age and donor age, was used for continuous outcomes, which are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

c

Significance determined at P ≤.005.

d

Defined as a serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl, a diagnosis of renal failure, or dialysis, using the definition of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry report.2

e

N = 320: excludes 27 patients who died during the HT admission; Group 1 = 254; Group 2 = 34; Group 3 = 32.