Table 2.
Comparison of different combinations of prosthesis components in the reverse hybrid group
| Brand name cup/stem | Manufacturer cup/stem | N | Revisions | Median follow-up (range) | Mean age (min–max) | % < 60 year | % male | No. of hospitals (max % at hospital) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite/Corail | Landos Depuy/Depuy | 1762 | 40 | 2.6 (0–10) | 60 (21–92) | 48 | 40 | 15 (34%) |
| Titan/Corail | Landos Depuy/Depuy | 722 | 21 | 3.0 (0–9.8) | 63 (27–91) | 36 | 36 | 11 (34%) |
| Kronos/Corail | Landos Depuy/Depuy | 527 | 12 | 1.8 (0–9.7) | 63 (20–92) | 33 | 32 | 4 (83%) |
| RPE a/Corail | Smith & Nephew/Depuy | 295 | 17 | 5.6 (0–9.9) | 58 (18–90) | 58 | 37 | 11 (35%) |
| Exeter/ ABG II | Stryker b/Stryker | 172 | 6 | 5.4 (1.4–7.0) | 73 (50–88) | 2 | 37 | 2 (82%) |
| RPE a/Hactiv | Smith & Nephew/Scanos c | 126 | 5 | 3.6 (0–5.6) | 64 (19–91) | 38 | 37 | 2 (97%) |
| Exeter/Corail | Stryker b/Depuy | 142 | 2 | 1.9 (0–9.9) | 64 (19–87) | 35 | 18 | 5 (67%) |
| Charnley/Corail | Depuy/Depuy | 105 | 2 | 2.8 (0.4–9.9) | 58 (21–86) | 61 | 21 | 14 (46%) |
| RPE a/Taperloc | Smith & Nephew/Biomet | 112 | 3 | 3.8 (2.5–4.7) | 61 (40–82) | 36 | 33 | 1 (100%) |
a Full brand name: Reflection Cemented All-Poly.
b Full brand name: Stryker, Osteonics, Howmedica
c Full brand name: Scanos Evolutis