Table 2. Differential time requirements for RR induction in HEp-2 cells treated with different CTPS1 and IMPDH2 inhibitors at 2 mM concentration.
Percent HEp-2 cells with RR (total counted); number of experiments | |||
Time after addition | Ribavirin1 | DON2 | Acivicin3 |
0 min | 0% (300); n = 3 | 0% (300); n = 3 | 0% (300); n = 3 |
30 min4 | 15.2% (67); n = 2 | 8.3% (120); n = 1 | 5.2% (102); n = 1 |
1 h5 | 98.1% (53); n = 2 | 13.7% (80); n = 3 | 11.5% (87); n = 3 |
2 h5 | 95.2% (42); n = 2 | 20.2% (89); n = 2 | 19.3% (119); n = 2 |
3 h6 | 98.1% (55); n = 2 | 70.5% (88); n = 3 | 39.4% (109); n = 2 |
24 h7 | 98.2% (231); n = 3 | 94.8% (98); n = 5 | 97.3% (226); n = 4 |
Ribavirin induced RR as early as 30 min and between 1 to 24 h, nearly all cells had RR (p<0.0001, 0 min vs all time points and 30 min vs 1 to 24 h). There is no statistical significance between 1 to 24 h after Bonferroni's adjustment;
Induction of RR by DON was slower than Ribavirin (p<0.0001, 1, 2, and 3 h; ns, 30 min and 24 h) and the percentage of RR positive cells gradually increased after 1–3 h and was nearly all cells at 24 h.
Acivicin had similar pattern to DON in which RR positive cells gradually increased after 1 h and nearly all cells at 24 h.
Ribavirin vs DON and DON vs Acivicin, ns; Ribavirin vs Acivicin, p = 0.03;
Ribavirin vs DON and Ribavirin vs Acivicin, p<0.0001; DON vs Acivicin, ns;
Ribavirin vs DON, DON vs Acivicin, Ribavirin vs Acivicin, p<0.0001;
ns between Ribavirin, DON, and Acivicin.