Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 29;7(12):e1002450. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002450

Table 2. Comparison of mycological characteristics among strains.

Growth rate (cm)a
Strain CM SDC Biomassb (mg) Conidiationc (×100/cm2) Appressoriumd formation (%) Penetratione (%)
Guy11 6.5±0.2 5.9±0.1 0.1255±0.0060 99.6±18.4 96.9±6.2 85.3±3.3
ΔMorgs1 5.0±0.1 4.5±0.1 0.0575±0.0115 64.0±10.2 97.4±5.0 78.9±3.1
ΔMorgs2 6.3±0.1 5.4±0.1 0.0876±0.0163 158.3±22.4 98.0±2.4 85.6±3.9
ΔMorgs3 6.4±0.2 5.8±0.2 0.0728±0.0070 154.7±26.0 96.3±4.7 61.1±1.9
ΔMorgs4 5.5±0.1 4.5±0.1 0.0505±0.0040 3.8±1.6 98.2±6.6 85.6±4.3
ΔMorgs5 6.7±0.2 6.7±0.2 0.1285±0.0034 101.2±20.2 97.8±5.8 83.0±3.8
ΔMorgs6 6.7±0.2 6.1±0.1 0.1145±0.0065 107.5±21.8 98.7±3.0 82.4±3.2
ΔMorgs7 6.3±0.2 5.9±0.1 0.1001±0.0050 95.5±9.2 97.6±5.6 20.6±1.8
ΔMorgs8 6.5±0.2 6.5±0.2 0.1443±0.0203 97.0±15.2 99.0±8.4 84.8±4.4
a

Diameter of hyphal radii at day 10 after incubation on CM and SDC agar plates at room temperature.

b

Dry weight of hyphal at day 2 after incubation in liquid complete medium at room temperature by shaken at 150 rpm.

c

Number of conidia harvested from a 9 cm SDC plate at day 10 after incubation at room temperature.

d

Percentage of appressorium formation on artificial surface at 24 h post-inoculation at room temperature.

e

Percentage of appressoria penetrated onion epidermal cells at 24 h post-inoculation.

Mean and standard deviations were calculated with results from three replicates.