Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2011 Aug 22;12(2):304–313. doi: 10.1037/a0025238

Table 1.

Means and Standard Deviations of Major Study Variables

M (SD) M (SD)
Girls
M (SD)
Boys
Observed positive emotion
Overall (number of observations) 48.83 (43.25)
    Same-gender peer interactions 33.97 (35.52) 34.91 (34.54)
    Other-gender peer interactions 16.66 (16.46) 12.39 (12.32)
Overall/Total peer interactionsa .43 (.14)
    Same-gender peer interactions .42 (.15) .42 (.15)
    Other-gender peer interactions .43 (.18) .42 (.18)
Mutual (number of observations) 31.10 (28.74)
    Same-gender peer interactions 22.62 (24.73) 21.89 (23.13)
    Other-gender peer interactions 10.08 (9.33) 7.86 (7.84)
Mutual/Total positive interactionsb .63 (.12)
    Same-gender peer interactions .64 (.17) .62 (.15)
    Other-gender peer interactions .60 (.21) .63 (.26)
Teachers’ Ratings of Positive Adjustment
Prosocial 2.23 (.45)
      Girls 2.38 (.39)
      Boys 2.10 (.45)
Interaction 2.69 (.48)
      Girls 2.86 (.47)
      Boys 2.55 (.44)
Social development 3.07 (.69)
      Girls 3.31 (.60)
      Boys 2.87 (.70)
Cooperation 2.50 (.50)
      Girls 2.67 (.40)
      Boys 2.34 (.54)
Teachers’ Ratings of Negative Adjustment
Hyperactive 1.51 (.56)
      Girls 1.28 (.39)
      Boys 1.70 (.61)
Exclusion 1.28 (.38)
      Girls 1.22 (.33)
      Boys 1.33 (.41)
Disruption 1.75 (.55)
      Girls 1.54 (.41)
      Boys 1.92 (.60)
Disconnection 1.69 (.49)
      Girls 1.56 (.43)
      Boys 1.79 (.51)
a

Proportion score calculated as the number of times the target child displayed PE divided by the number of interactions with peers (to control for the number of times the child was observed interacting with a peer).

b

Proportion score calculated as the number of times the target child and peer matched PE divided by the number of total observations in which the target child exhibited PE (to control for the number of times the target child was observed displaying PE).