Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 17;23(1):317–326. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1780-1

Table 2.

Subject non-adherence, non-compliance, and non-persistence (efficacy populations)

Crude rate, n (%) Absolute ratea reduction Rate ratioa p valuea
Denosumab Alendronate (95% CI) (95% CI)
First year (n = 126) (n = 124)
Adherenceb 111 (88.1) 95 (76.6)
Non-adherence 15 (11.9) 29 (23.4) 10.5 (1.3, 19.7) 0.54 (0.31, 0.93) 0.026
Compliancec 114 (90.5) 97 (78.2)
Non-compliance 12 (9.5) 27 (21.8) 11.0 (2.2, 19.7) 0.48 (0.26, 0.87) 0.014
Persistenced 114 (90.5) 99 (79.8)
Non-persistence 12 (9.5) 25 (20.2) 9.8 (1.1, 18.5) 0.50 (0.27, 0.93) 0.029
Second year (n = 106) (n = 115)
Adherenceb 98 (92.5) 73 (63.5)
Non-adherence 8 (7.5) 42 (36.5) 30.9 (20.6, 41.3) 0.20 (0.10, 0.41) <0.001
Compliancec 99 (93.4) 78 (67.8)
Non-compliance 7 (6.6) 37 (32.2) 27.7 (17.6, 37.7) 0.20 (0.09, 0.43) <0.001
Persistenced 103 (97.2) 82 (71.3)
Non-persistence 3 (2.8) 33 (28.7) 27.4 (18.1, 36.7) 0.09 (0.03, 0.30) <0.001

aBased on the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method stratified by center and prior osteoporotic fracture

bAdherence was defined as satisfying the criteria for both compliance and persistence

cCompliance was defined as receiving two injections 6 months ± 4 weeks apart (denosumab) or at least 80% of weekly doses (alendronate)

dPersistence was defined as receiving either two injections total (denosumab) or at least two weekly doses in the last month (alendronate), and completing the year of treatment within the allotted time (both groups)