Skip to main content
. 1999 May-Jun;10(3):207–238. doi: 10.1155/1999/378394

TABLE 7.5.

Results of clinical trials involving sparfloxacin

Author (reference) Design n () Indication Regimen Duration Results
Respiratory tract infections
DeAbate et al (177) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 798 (504) Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 10 days S: 216/253 (85%) success*
Oflox: 400 mg oral every 12 h 10 days Oflox: 223/251 (89%) success* [95% CI −9.3% to 2.4%] (regimens are “statistically equivalent”)
End of treatment success
Allegra et al (178) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 734 (351) Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease S: 200 mg oral on day 1 then 100 mg oral every day Mean of 10 days S: 151/173 (87%)
Amox/clav: 500/125 mg oral tid Mean of 10 days Amox/clav: 158/178 (89%)
[90% CI=–4.2% to 7.2%] (The S regimen is “as effective” as the amox/clav regimen)
10 day post-treatment success rates S: 129/164 (79%)
Amox/clav: 130/163 (80%) [90% CI=–6.3% to 8.5%] (The S regimen is “as effective” as the amox/clav regimen)
Overall efficacy
Taytard et al (179) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind NA (201) Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 5 days S: 86%
Amox/clav: 500/125 mg tid 10 days Amox/clav: 85% (a statistical analysis of these results was not provided)
End of treatment success§
Lode et al (180) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 808 (620) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day Mean of 9.5 days S: 269/310 (87%)
Amox/clav: 500/125 mg oral tid Mean of 9.5 days Amox/clav: 121/152 (80%) [90% CI=−13.4% to −0.9%] (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the amox/clav regimen)
Erythro: 1 g oral bid Mean of 9.5 days Erythro: 135/158 (85%) [90% CI=–6.9% to 4.3%] (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the erythro regimen)
42 day post-treatment success rates§
S: 239/285 (84%)
Amox/clav: 104/139 (75%)
[90% CI=−16% to −2%] (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the amox/clav regimen)
Erythro: 109/132 (83%)
[90% CI=–7.8% to 5.2%]
  (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the amox/clav regimen)
Bensch et al (181) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 428 (338) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 10 days S: 153/177 (86%) success
Erythro: 500 mg oral every 6 h 10 days Erythro: 130/161 (81%) success
[95% CI=–2.2% to 13.6%] (regimens are “statistically equivalent”)
Donowitz et al (182) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 330 (262) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 10 days S: 116/134 (87%) success
  Cefaclor: 500 mg oral every 8 h 10 days Cefaclor: 108/128 (84%) success
[95% CI=–6.3% to 10.7%] (regimens are “statistically equivalent”)
4- to 7-day post-treatment success§
Ortqvist et al (183) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 304 (264) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day Mean of 10.2 days S: 124/131 (95%)
ROXI: 150 mg oral bid Mean of 10.1 days ROXI: 106/133 (80%)
[90% CI=−21.5% to −8.4%] (“sparfloxacin was superior”)
42-day post-treatment success§
S: 121/129 (94%)
ROXI: 103/131 (79%)
[90% CI=−22.0% to −8.3%] (“sparfloxacin was superior”)
End of treatment success**
Portier et al (184) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 213 (167) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day Mean of 10 days S: 79/86 (92%)
Amox/oflox: amox 1 g oral tid and oflox 200 mg oral bid Mean of 10 days Amox/oflox: 66/81 (81%)
[90% CI=−19% to −1.8%] (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the amox/oflox regimen)
30 day post-treatment success rates**
S: 69/79 (87%)
Amox/oflox: 61/78 (78%)
[90% CI=–19% to 0.7%] (The S regimen is “at least as effective” as the amox/oflox regimen)
End of treatment success††
Aubier et al (185) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 329 (286) Community-acquired pneumonia S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day Mean of 10.8 days S: 125/136 (92%)
Amox: amox 1 g oral tid Mean of 10.8 days Amox: 131/150 (87%)
[90% CI=–10.5% to 1.3%] (The S regimen is at least “as effective” as the amox regimen)
39 to 41 day post-treatment success††
S: 112/126 (89%)
Amox: 118/140 (84%)
[90% CI=–11.4% to 2.2%] (The S regimen is at least “as effective” as the amox regimen)
Genitourinary tract infections
Less than 15 day post-treatment success‡‡
Moi et al (198) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 238 (184) all males Acute gonococcal urethritis S: 200 mg oral single dose Single dose S: 95/96 (99%)
Cipro: 250 mg oral single dose Single dose Cipro: 86/88 (98%)
[90% CI=–4.4% to 1.9%] (regimens are “equally effective”)
2- to 5-day post-treatment success§§
Phillips et al (199) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 725 (608) all males Nongonococcal urethritis S: 200 mg oral on day 1 then oral 100 mg every day 3 days S (3 day): 159/195 (82%)
S: 200 mg oral on day 1 then 100 mg oral every day 7 days S (7 day): 161/201 (80%)
Doxy: 200 mg oral every day 7 days Doxy: 174/212 (82%)
14 to 18 day post-treatment success¶¶
S (3 day): 113/186 (61%)
S (7 day): 112/183 (61%)
Doxy: 121/196 (62%)
(90% CI were calculated but not given. Overall success was “statistically equivalent” between groups)
4- to 14-day post-treatment success***
Naber et al (200) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 686 (477) Complicated urinary tract infection S: 200 mg oral on day 1 then 100 mg oral every day Mean of 11 days S: 166/235 (71%)
Cipro: 500 mg oral bid Mean of 11 days Cipro: 187/242 (77%)
[90% CI=0.04% to 13.23%] (The groups “differ” with cipro being superior)
15 to 56 day post-treatment success***
S: 148/247 (60%)
Cipro: 158/239 (66%)
[90% CI=–1.0% to 13.4%] (The groups “differ” with cipro being superior)
“Clinical results” were “equivalent” between groups
Iravani et al (201) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 1175 (978) all females Acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection S: 400 mg oral single dose Single dose S (1 day): 335/360 (93%) success
[95% CI=−0.2% to 9.1%]
S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 3 days S (3 day): 328/355 (92%) success
[95% CI=–0.9% to 8.5%]
Cipro: 250 mg oral every 12 h 7 days Cipro: 233/263 (89%) success
Henry et al (202) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, open label, observer blind 419 (383) Acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 3 days S: 173/187 (93%) success
Oflox: 200 mg oral every 12 h 3 days Oflox: 185/196 (94%) success
[95% CI=–6.8% to 3.1%]
Clinical efficacy†††
Kawada et al (203) (Abst) Prospective, open, noncomparative 712 (712) Uncomplicated UTI (n=79), complicated UTI (n=260), urethritis (n=315), prostatitis (n=58) S: 100 to 300 mg oral every day 3 to 14 days Uncomplicated UTI: 79/79 (100%)
Complicated UTI: 168/260 (65%)
Urethritis: 293/315 (93%)
Prostatitis: 46/58 (79%)
Clinical efficacy‡‡‡
Matsuda et al (204) (Abst) Prospective, open, noncomparative 201 (201) Adnexitis (n=31), endometritis (n=85), cervicitis (n=45), other (n=40) S: 200 to 300 mg oral every day or bid 7 days Adnexitis: 30/31 (97%)
Endometritis: 80/85 (94%)
Cervicitis: 44/45 (98%)
Others: 40/40 (100%)
Skin and skin structure infections
Clinical success
Lipsky et al (210) (Abst) Prospective, randomized, double-blind 603 (475) Skin and skin structure infections S: 400 mg oral on day 1 then 200 mg oral every day 10 days S: 90%
Cipro: 750 mg oral every 12 h 10 days Cipro: 87%
[95% CI=–2.8% to 8.6%] (regimens are “statistically equivalent”)
Clinical efficacy§§§
Takahashi et al (211) (Abst) Prospective, open, noncomparative 179 (179) Various (folliculitis, furuncle, impetigo, erysipelas, subcutaneous abscess plus many others) S: 100 or 200 mg oral every day or bid 7 or 10 days S: 155/179 (87%)
Clinical efficacy‡‡‡
Watanabe et al (212) (Abst) Prospective, open, noncomparative 82 (82) Various (infected atheroma, wound infection, cellulitis and others) S: 200 mg oral every day or 300 mg oral every day or 150 mg oral bid 4 to 12 days S: 71/82 (87%)

n () Number of patients (number of patients with complete data at the end of treatment or at follow-up if there was no evaluation at the end of treatment). Where n appears under regimen or indication, it refers to the number of clinically evaluable patients that received the treatment or had the condition.

*

Success defined as cure or improvement with eradication or presumed eradication.

P not reported.

Success defined as cure (return to normal of evaluated symptoms) or improvement (decrease in evaluated symptoms);

§

Success defined as cure (complete resolution of signs and symptoms) and resolution or improvement on chest radiography or clinical improvement (incomplete resolution) and resolution on chest radiography.

Success defined by clinical response.

**

Success defined as clinical cure (apyrexia plus resolution of all signs and symptoms) and resolution or improvement of radiographic signs, or as clinical improvement (apyrexia plus improvement of signs and symptoms) with resolution or improvement of radiographic signs.

††

Success defined as radiographic resolution or improvement and clinical cure (absence of baseline symptoms), or radiographic resolution and clinical improvement (absence of chills and fever).

‡‡

Success defined as eradication of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, clinical cure or improvement (disappearance or improvement of symptoms) and less than 10 polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) per field (magnification ×1000).

§§

Success defined as clinical cure or clinical improvement less than or equal to 5 PMNs (magnification ×1000), plus the abscence of Chlamydia trachomatis.

¶¶

Success defined as clinical cure less than or equal to 10 PMNs (must be fewer than at end of treatment visit) and abscence of C trachomatis.

***

Success defined as overall efficacy based on clinical efficacy (resolution of symptoms present at inclusion into study) and bacteriological efficacy (eradication of initial pathogen).

†††

Clinical efficacy evaluated based on changes in symptoms.

‡‡‡

Clinical efficacy was rated as “excellent” or “good”, based on findings before and after treatment.

§§§

Clinical efficacy was rated as “excellent” or “good”, based on clinical and bacteriological response pre- and post-treatment. Amox Amoxicillin; Amox/clav Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; Amox/oflox Amoxicillin/ofloxacin; Cipro Ciprofloxacin; Doxy Doxycycline; Duration Length of treatment; NA Information not available; Oflox Ofloxacin; ROXI Roxithromycin; S Sparfloxacin; UTI Urinary tract infection