Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 18;119(1):296–307. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-364265

Table 4.

Multivariate analyses of risk factors for grades C-D AGVHD

Variable SD
URD
n OR 95% CI P n OR 95% CI P
Treatment category .03 .04
    1: MA+TBI+PBSC 709 1.0 534 1.00
    2: MA + TBI + BM 245 0.90 0.62-1.32 .60 733 0.79 0.62-1.00 .05
    3: MA + nonTBI + PBSC 1017 1.03 0.81-1.32 .79 350 0.92 0.68-1.23 .56
    4: MA + nonTBI + BM 492 0.61 0.44-0.85 .003 265 0.67 0.48-0.93 .02
    5: RIC + PBSC 622 1.00 0.76-1.31 .98 405 0.85 0.64-1.12 .25
    6: RIC + BM 67 0.88 0.46-1.70 .71 83 0.48 0.28-0.83 .009
GVHD prophylaxis .0003
    CSA + MTX ± other 2645 1.00
    Tacrolimus ± MTX ± other 484 0.56 0.42-0.75 < .0001
    Other 23 0.59 0.17-1.99 .39
Disease status at transplant .01
    Early 1750 1.00
    Intermediate 520 1.02 0.78-1.32 .90
    Advanced 666 1.32 1.05-1.66 .02
    Unknown 216 1.55 1.10-2.18 .01
Sex mismatch (D/R) .009
    M/M, M/F, F/F 2397 1.00
    F/M 746 1.37 1.12-1.69 .002
    Missing 9 0.62 0.08-5.06 .66
Disease .003
    ALL 446 1.00
    AML 1044 1.01 0.78-1.29 .97
    CML 463 1.52 1.14-2.01 .004
    MDS 417 1.25 0.93-1.70 .15
HLA match .0006
    8/8 matched 1532 1.00
    7/8 matched 614 1.36 1.12-1.66 .002
    ≤ 6/8 matched 224 1.55 1.16-2.08 .003

Pairwise comparisons significant for the treatment categories were as follows for SD, none; and for URD, treatment category 3 versus treatment category 6 (P = .02).

CSA indicates cyclosporine; MTX, methotrexate; D, donor; R, recipient; M, male; F, female; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; and MA, myeloablative.