Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Early Adolesc. 2011 Jun;31(3):415–442. doi: 10.1177/0272431610366245

Table 2.

Standardized Maximum Likelihood Estimates (N = 360)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4

Measurement Coefficients
Friends' Substance Use .80 .80
Substance Use Prototypes .57 .57
Friends' Dating .51 .50
Dating (Youth) .75 .75
Steady Boyfriend .63 .67
Alcohol Use .87 .89 .86 .89
Cigarette Use .90 .91 .90 .91
Marijuana Use .95 .93 .96 .94
Structural Coefficients
Control Variables
Financial Strain→Pub .03 .03 .03 .03
Single Mom→Pub .07 .07 .07 .07
Remote→Pub −.17** −.17* −.17** −.17*
Financial Strain→Date .05 .05
Single Mom→Date .13* .13*
Remote→Date −.05 −.05
Financial Strain→Defs .04 .04
Single Mom→Defs .05 .05
Remote→Defs .06 .06
Financial Strain→Sub Use .07 .03 .04 .03
Single Mom→Sub Use .07 −.01 .05 −.00
Remote→Sub Use −.07 −.04 −.11 −.08
Focal Relationship

Pub→Sub Use .37*** .10 .25*** .11

Mediating Constructs
Pub→Defs .20** .20**
Defs→Sub Use .61*** .40***
Pub→Date .42*** .42***
Date→Sub Use .66*** .42***
Construct Covariances
Financial Strain ↔ Remote −.06 −.06 −.06 −.06
Financial Strain ↔ Single Mom .15** .15** .15** .15**
Single Mom ↔ Remote −.08 −.08 −.08 −.08
Date→Defs .55***
Goodness of Fit Indices
χ 2 9.53 (df = 7); p = 18.75 (df= 19); p = 16.87 (df= 11); p = 25.79 (df= 22); p =
CFI .99 1.00 .99 .99
RMSEA .03 .00 .04 .01
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001;

Two-tailed tests.

Note: All measurement model coefficients statistically significant (p < .05). Model 1 includes a test of the focal relationship between puberty (Pub) and substance use (Sub Use). Model 2 adds dating/mixed sex peers (Date) as a mediator. Model 3 includes the focal relationship and social definitions of substance use (Defs) as a mediating construct. Model 4 includes both social definitions and dating as separate and related mediating constructs.