Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;112(2 Pt 1):341–349. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817cfdde

Table 1.

Outcomes of the TVT® procedure in the obese

Study N (Obese /
Nonobese)
Follow-up
(months)
% Cure (Obese
/ Nonobese)
P value Complications
Mukherjee et al
(26), 2001
87 / 156 Not given 90 / 91.2 NS No difference in urinary
retention, operative
complications
Chung et al
(32), 2002
60 / 31 (12 -24) 100 / 100 NS No difference in length of
hospital stay, voiding
dysfunction
Rafii et al (31),
2003
39 / 149 27 (6 - 38) 82 / 91.2 0.1 More persistent urge UI in
obese (17.9% vs. 4.6%)
Lovatsis et al
(28), 2003
35 / 35 (6 – 24) 88.6 / 91.4 NS - More bladder perforations
in nonobese (14 vs. 0%, P =
0.03)
- Longer operative time in
obese (49 vs. 35 min, P <
0.05)
Skriapas et al
(27), 2005
31 / 52 18.5 (12 –
24)
87 / 92 0.103 More early postoperative
complications in obese
(48.4% vs. 38.5%, P =
0.021)
Ku et al (33),
2006
45 / 240 10 84.4 / 91.6 0.173 No difference in urinary
retention, persistent urgency
Hellberg et al
(30), 2006
163 / 570 68.4 (24 –
96)
66.1 / 77.5 * * Cure rates for BMI < 25 =
81%, for BMI > 35 = 52.1%
(P = 0.0005)