Table 1.
Outcomes of the TVT® procedure in the obese
Study | N (Obese / Nonobese) |
Follow-up (months) |
% Cure (Obese / Nonobese) |
P value | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mukherjee et al (26), 2001 |
87 / 156 | Not given | 90 / 91.2 | NS | No difference in urinary retention, operative complications |
Chung et al (32), 2002 |
60 / 31 | (12 -24) | 100 / 100 | NS | No difference in length of hospital stay, voiding dysfunction |
Rafii et al (31), 2003 |
39 / 149 | 27 (6 - 38) | 82 / 91.2 | 0.1 | More persistent urge UI in obese (17.9% vs. 4.6%) |
Lovatsis et al (28), 2003 |
35 / 35 | (6 – 24) | 88.6 / 91.4 | NS | - More bladder perforations in nonobese (14 vs. 0%, P = 0.03) - Longer operative time in obese (49 vs. 35 min, P < 0.05) |
Skriapas et al (27), 2005 |
31 / 52 | 18.5 (12 – 24) |
87 / 92 | 0.103 | More early postoperative complications in obese (48.4% vs. 38.5%, P = 0.021) |
Ku et al (33), 2006 |
45 / 240 | 10 | 84.4 / 91.6 | 0.173 | No difference in urinary retention, persistent urgency |
Hellberg et al (30), 2006 |
163 / 570 | 68.4 (24 – 96) |
66.1 / 77.5 | * | * Cure rates for BMI < 25 = 81%, for BMI > 35 = 52.1% (P = 0.0005) |