Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;112(2 Pt 1):341–349. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817cfdde

Table 2.

Effect of non-surgical weight loss on UI

Study N Design BMI (or wt) Δ Δ in UI episodes Other Outcomes
Subak et al
(70), 2002
10 Weight loss
program
BMI down from
38.3 to 33.0 (−5.3
+/− 6.2; P < 0.03)
13 to 8 per week
after wt loss (P <
0.07)
All pt’s losing ≥ 5%
body wt (6 of 10)
had > 50% reduction
in UI freq (P < 0.03)
Subak et al
(72), 2005
40 Randomized to:
1. Immediate
intervention (n
= 20)
2. Delayed (3
month) inter-
vention (n =
20)
Wt Δ by group:
1. −16 kg
2. No change

P < 0.0001
Reduction in weekly
SUI (%):
1. 60
2. 15

P <0.0005
- Group 2 had 71%
reduction in weekly
UI after wt loss
- Group 1 had
significant
improvements in IIQ
and UDI scores
Brown et al
(71), 2006
1957 Randomized to:
1. Lifestyle
intervention (n
= 660)
2. Metformin
(n = 636)
3. Placebo (n =
661)
Wt Δ by group:
1. −3.4 ± 8.2 kg
2. −1.5 ± 7.6 kg
3. +0.5 ± 6.7 kg

P < 0.001
Prevalence of
weekly SUI (%):
1. 31.3
2. 39.7
3. 36.7

P = 0.006
Weekly Urge UI
was lower in Group
1 (23.7% vs. 28.7
and 25.6), but not
significant (P =
0.12)
Subak et al
(73), 2007
338 Randomized to:
1. 6 month wt
loss program (n
= 226)
2. Health infor-
mation sessions
(n = 112)
Wt Δ by group:
1. −8 kg (8%)
2. −2 kg (2%)

P < 0.0001
Reduction in weekly
UI / SUI (%):
1. 49 / 59
2. 33 / 30

P = 0.01 / < 0.01
A 70% decrease in
UI episode
frequency was seen
in 41% of Group 1
vs. 22% in Group 2
(P < 0.003)