Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Behaviour. 2008;145(4-5):537–559. doi: 10.1163/156853908792451511

Table 2.

Mean (± 1 SE) duration until onset of each male’s behaviour after a female’s introduction (in s).

Control 30 ppm 60 ppm 100 ppm Statistics (K–W)
Biting 46.0 (21.1) 54.7 (19.5) 99.2 (57.7) 165.3 (35.1) χ2 = 8.24, df =3, p = 0.041
Leading 134.9 (31.2) 133.6 (40.8) 133.8 (60.6) 276.1 (126.6) χ2 = 1.26, df = 3, p = 0.747
Zig-zagging 218.5 (44.6) 167.5 (44.4) 195.5 (42.5) 318.6 (288.9) χ2 = 0.80, df = 3, p = 0.849
Dorsal pricking 471.5 (174.8) 165.6 (93.1) 291.5 (59.6) χ2 = 1.39, df = 2, p = 0.498
Boring 330.9 (43.5) 201.8 (55.0) 254.8 (36.5) χ2 = 3.10, df = 2, p = 0.213
Fanning 275.7 (46.6) 248.8 (73.1) 218.7 (7.2) χ2 = 0.03, df = 2, p = 0.984
Gluing 555.9 (125.0) 298.9 (83.9) 269.8 (242.2) χ2 = 1.74, df = 2, p = 0.419
Creeping through 294.6 (71.6) 292.2 (116.3) 368.7 (87.1) χ2 = 1.06, df = 2, p = 0.590
Quivering 461.9 (97.8) 394.8 (90.7) 285.5 (86.4) χ2 = 0.63, df = 2, p = 0.730
Fertilizing 890.8 (172.7) 791.9 (298.8) 518.5 (360.6) χ2 = 0.89, df = 2, p = 0.640

Kruskal–Wallis (K–W) tests were used since sample sizes were small (N ≤ 10 fish per treatment), and only biting differed significantly between groups. Individual fish means were used to calculate experimental group means.