Table 2.
Model fit statistics showing a confirmatory factor analysis with covariates (MIMIC) model, latent class analysis (LCA) 2-class and 3-class models with and without binge drinking and a factor mixture model in 361 college drinkers.
| log likelihood |
df | AIC | BIC | Adjusted BIC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIMIC * 10 criteria, no binge drinking (1 factor model) |
−1132.4 | 22 | 2308.9 | 2393.4 | 2323.6 |
| MIMIC * 10 criteria plus binge drinking (2 factor model) |
−1328.5 | 26 | 2709.0 | 2809.0 | 2726.4 |
| LCA (10 criteria no binge drinking) 2 classes (290, 71) 3 classes (217, 114, 30) |
−1227.2 −1186.4a |
21 32 |
2496.3 2436.7 |
2578.0 2561.2 |
2511.4 2459.7 |
| LCA (10 criteria plus binge drinking) 2 classes (268, 93) 3 classes (221, 112, 28) |
−1444.8 −1393.5a |
22 35 |
2935.7 2857.0 |
3025.1 2993.1 |
2952.2 2882.1 |
| Factor Mixture Model (10 criteria, no binge drinking) 2 classes (376, 12), 1 factor |
−1209.5 | 32 | 2482.9 | 2609.7 | 2508.1 |
*
Adjusted for age at initiation of alcohol drinking and sex.
a
p<0.001 comparing 3-class solution to 2-class solution