Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 18;42(1):19–29. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9478-x

Table 4.

Summary of the model fitting results of the longitudinal genetic analyses

−2 LL #par df χ2 df P BIC
Saturated model
1. Fully saturated 1961.155 120 13,834 −58715.507
2. rDZ = rSib (versus 1) 1980.646 100 13,854 19.491 20 .490 −58792.065
3. No sex differences for twin/sibling correlations (versus 1) 2005.494 81 13,873 44.339 39 .257 −58861.629
4. Covariate standardized age dropped (versus 1) 2004.964 114 13,840 43.809 6 <.001 −58719.494
5. Covariate squared standardized age dropped (versus 1) 1983.825 114 13,840 22.670 6 .001 −58730.063
ADE model (models include restrictions from models 25)
1. ADE-model 2211.950 29 13,929 −59000.051
2. AE-model (versus 6) 2222.021 23 13,935 10.071 6 .122 −59020.906
3. AE-model—A3 dropped (versus 7) 2228.579 22 13,936 6.558 1 .010 −59021.943
4. AE-model—A3 and a22 dropped (versus 8) 2239.785 21 13,937 11.206 1 .001 −59020.655
5. AE-model—A3 and a32 dropped (versus 8) 2237.624 21 13,937 9.045 1 .003 −59021.735
6. AE-model—A3, e21, e31 and e32 dropped (versus 8) 2251.165 19 13,939 22.586 3 <.001 −59023.595
7. AE-model—A3, e21, e31 and e32 dropped + proportion variance explained by A equal for all age groups (versus 11) 2263.957 15 13,943 12.792 4 .012 −59034.460