Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 5;42(1):40–56. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9488-8

Table 4.

Estimates of tetrachoric correlationsa (with standard errors) for the CAGE as dichotomy (0 vs. 1+ yes answers)

MZM 15–17 18–20 21–23 24–26 27–29 30–32 DZM 15–17 18–20 21–23 24–26 27–29 30–32
15–17 .73 (.14) 15–17 .68 (.17)
18–20 .29 (.18) .50 (.10) 18–20 .19 (.22) .32 (.13)
21–23 .19 (.21) .43 (.10) .57 (.08) 21–23 .11 (.26) −.10 (.16) .08 (.14)
24–26 .09 (.24) .26 (.11) .33 (.09) .59 (.09) 24–26 .08 (.34) .26 (.17) .34 (.15) .05 (.17)
27–29 −.16 (.36) .41 (.13) .43 (.11) .50 (.09) .57 (.12) 27–29 .03 (.44) .41 (.18) .17 (.16) .24 (.14) .28 (.19)
30–32 .43 (.33) −.10 (.20) .24 (.14) .36 (.12) .36 (.13) .35 (.17) 30–32 .43 (.45) .31 (.22) .03 (.20) .27 (.17) −.03 (.18) .06 (.23)
MZF 15–17 18–20 21–23 24–26 27–29 30–32 DZF 15–17 18–20 21–23 24–26 27–29 30–32
15–17 .54 (.15) 15–17 .56 (.25)
18–20 .43 (.15) .42 (.09) 18–20 .41 (.33) .45 (.11)
21–23 .53 (.12) .43 (.10) .44 (.09) 21–23 .05 (.30) .30 (.15) .27 (.13)
24–26 .13 (.18) .60 (.08) .32 (.09) .43 (.10) 24–26 −.01 (.31) .05 (.17) .14 (.14) .27 (.14)
27–29 .09 (.24) .43 (.11) .43 (.08) .39 (.08) .49 (.09) 27–29 .21 (.38) .32 (.16) .00 (.17) .27 (.12) .27 (.16)
30–32 .21 (.25) .51 (.14) .36 (.11) .40 (.10) .50 (.08) .44 (.11) 30–32 .30 (.43) −.16 (.28) .33 (.16) .23 (.14) .22 (.14) .20 (.18)
DOS 15–17 18–20 21–23 24–26 27–29 30–32
15–17 .48 (.17)
18–20 .10 (.16) .26 (.10)
21–23 −.06 (.19) −.04 (.12) .06 (.11)
24–26 .17 (.16) −.06 (.13) −.16 (.10) .20 (.12)
27–29 −.02 (.24) − .06 (.15) .04 (.11) −.13 (.10) .11 (.16)
30–32 −.28 (.28) −.30 (.19) .10 (.13) .13 (.11) −.09 (.13) .48 (.14)

aCross twin-within age correlations at diagonal in italic and cross twin-cross age correlations off-diagonal