Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Aerosol Sci Technol. 2011 Sep;45(9):1090–1108. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2011.581256

TABLE 7.

Site-specific instrumental regression estimates for PM10

Covariates 14 17 60 All sites
Ln(AODMODIS) = f (Factors 1, 2, and 3) 0.908*** (0.630–1.186) 1.051*** (0.802–1.300) 1.188*** (0.896–1.480) 0.972*** (0.798–1.146)
Sin(month since January 2000/2006) –0.209*** (–0.338–−0.080) –0.272*** (–0.427– −0.117) 0.0939 (–0.042–0.230) –0.127*** (–0.213–−0.041)
Cos(month since January 2000/2006) 0.350** (0.062–0.638) 0.229* (–0.020–0.478) 0.643*** (0.386–0.900) 0.368*** (0.201–0.535)
Season dummy (1 for June, July, and August, 0 for the rest) 0.122 (–0.211–0.455) –0.271 (–0.592–0.050) –0.061 (–0.294–0.172) –0.0963 (–0.281–0.088)
Constant 4.354*** (3.903–.805) 4.857*** (4.406–5.308) 4.925*** (4.511–5.339) 4.591*** (4.313–4.869)
Observations 244 276 378 898
***

p < 0.01.

**

p < 0.05.

*

p < 0.1.

Note: Factor 1 = positively correlated surface temperature, dew point, relative humidity, and negative visibility; Factor 2 = relative humidity inversely associated with surface temperature; and Factor 3 = atmospheric pressure inversely associated with wind speed (see Table 5 for details). 95% confidence limits (CIs) in parentheses.