Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Oct 16;18(11):1235–1243. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2154

Figure 5. Influence of C-terminal MPER residues on 2F5 and 2F5m binding as measured by SPR.

Figure 5

Each bar represents the apparent I100FS (a) and F100BS (b) binding affinities in comparison with those of 2F5 for a series of alanine-substituted MPER peptides versus wt MPER. For A667, a D substitution was introduced. The amount of each MPER variant peptide bound to DOPC-DOPG liposome was normalized to that of wt peptide. 30 μl of wt 2F5 at 20 μg ml−1, 2F5m I100FS at 35 μg ml−1 and 2F5m F100BS at 50 μg ml−1 were injected over peptide–liposome complex at the flow rate of 10 μl min−1. Apparent binding affinities of each antibody for MPER alanine mutants in comparison with the wt peptide were measured by response units taken on the dissociation time point at 3 min following 3 min of association time by BIAcore. (c,d) Binding of 2F5 and mutants to MPER peptides containing or lacking the C-helical MPER region. 20 μg ml−1 of each antibody was injected over peptide-liposome complex except in the case of double mutant L100AS F100BS where 100 μg ml−1 was used.