Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2010 Aug 7;140(1):91–100. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.053

Table 1. Studies included in the meta-analysis.

Study Modality Subjects Supraliminal rectal
inflation conditions
Berman et al. (2000)23 PET Study 1: 13 (7 F) IBS 20, 45 and 60 mmHg
Study 2: 17 (6 F) IBS
Hobday et al (2001)27 fMRI 8 M Controls average 11 p.s.i.
Lotze et al (2001)30 fMRI 8 Controls (4 F) average 173.6ml
Naliboff et al (2001)13 PET 12 (2 F) IBS 45 mmHg
12 (2 F) Controls
Bonaz et al (2002)25 fMRI 11 (10 F) IBS individually determined maximum tolerable volume
Verne et al (2003)36 fMRI 9 (6 F) IBS 55 mmHg
9 (6 F) Controls
Naliboff et al (2003)32 PET 42 (23 F) IBS 45 mmHg
Andresen et al (2005)22 fMRI 8 (3 F) Controls individually determined perception threshold +10 mmHg
8 (5 F) IBS
Kwan et al (2005)29 fMRI 11 (7 F) Controls individually determined moderate pain
9 (6 F) IBS
Berman et al (2006)24 fMRI 13 (6 F) Controls 25 and 45 mmHg
Naliboff et al (2006)33 PET 12 (8 F) IBS 45 and 60 mmHg
Song et al (2006)35 fMRI 12 F IBS pain detection +20%
12 F Controls
Price et al (2007)34 fMRI 9 IBS individually determined moderate pain (rating of 40 out of 100)
Berman et al (2008)7 fMRI 14 F IBS 25 and 45 mmHg
12 F Controls
Ringel et al (2008)4 fMRI 10 F Controls 15 and 50 mmHg
10 F IBS
Elsenbruch et al (2009)26 fMRI 15 F IBS individually determined discomfort level
12 F Controls
Kanazawa et al (2010)28 PET 32 M Controls 20 and 40 mmHg
Moisset et al (2010)31 fMRI 11 F Controls individually determined non-painful sensation and moderate pain
M: Male; F: Female