Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Oct 2;33(1):159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.009

Table 2.

Power for effects of a single agent on CVD in VITAL, a 2×2 factorial trial of 10,000 men aged ≥50 and 10,000 women aged ≥55, with 5 years of follow-up

Observed RRa True RRb Major
CVDc
Total
CVDd
CVD Mortality MI Stroke
0.90 0.875 34.6 52.8 - - -
0.85 0.812 66.1 86.9 - - -
0.80 0.750 89.4 98.6 45.1 50.9 51.0
0.75 0.687 98.2 >99.9 64.4 71.0 71.1
0.70 0.625 99.9 >99.9 80.9 86.4 86.5
0.65 0.560 >99.9 >99.9 91.9 95.2 95.2
0.60 0.500 >99.9 >99.9 97.3 98.8 98.8
a

Observed RR=intent-to-treat RR, including noncompliant participants. Compliance is assumed to be 80%.

b

True RR=that with perfect compliance.

c

Major CVD=myocardial infarction, stroke, and CVD mortality

d

Total CVD=myocardial infarction, stroke, CVD mortality, and coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention)

CVD, cardiovascular disease; MI, myocardial infarction; RR, rate ratio.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure