Table 2.

Estimates of species diversity for the samples.

Host ID	Site-specific sample	Sample ID	Raw reads	Reads analyzed	Unique sequence	Good's Coverage	OTUs at 3% difference	Ace	Chao 1
1	S	H1	18805	11580	3120	98.13%	687	902.15	944.54
	A-sup	H2	18448	9764	2307	98.56%	464	603.62	634.17
	A-sub	H3	15895	8035	2748	97.98%	597	740.87	775.64
	P-sup	H4	13974	7467	2142	96.69%	684	966.39	925.12
	P-sub	H5	14224	7730	2528	97.12%	702	932.10	923.01
2	S	H6	20982	11907	3264	98.35%	685	877.19	884.03
	A-sup	H7	19416	10935	2415	98.99%	379	491.50	490.02
	A-sub	H8	17295	9539	2060	98.66%	390	533.27	523.25
	P-sup	H9	22178	10085	2653	97.98%	631	846.61	842.29
	P-sub	H10	23105	10809	3160	98.06%	736	928.09	937.33
3	S	H11	19146	10970	3229	98.11%	612	847.56	878.51
	A-sup	H12	12515	5476	1933	97.11%	515	672.34	680.37
	A-sub	H13	13289	6581	1829	97.80%	466	608.60	631.71
	P-sup	H14	13105	6615	1896	97.57%	494	657.40	661.27
	P-sub	H15	12673	6456	1943	97.23%	539	728.34	757.23
4	S	U1	24258	13562	3929	98.50%	671	880.91	876.01
	A-sup	U2	18719	9591	2190	98.20%	495	700.72	713.79
	A-sub	U3	16282	7651	2636	97.56%	638	819.36	805.22
	P-sup	U4	20539	10035	3045	98.33%	617	766.07	749.34
	P-sub	U5	11515	5272	1963	96.47%	597	776.19	772.56
5	S	U6	20527	12890	3150	98.02%	722	1012.09	1001.18
	A-sup	U7	14307	7813	2436	97.82%	589	746.85	748.61
	A-sub	U8	14763	8078	2793	97.83%	621	785.67	781.26
	P-sup	U9	14787	7268	2213	97.14%	589	818.53	828.20
	P-sub	U10	16246	8916	2902	97.73%	656	858.40	934.10
6	S	U11	15739	8819	2569	97.74%	606	806.46	824.90
	A-sup	U12	12849	5407	2013	96.10%	570	819.64	810.82
	A-sub	U13	17990	8484	2844	97.15%	737	996.50	984.13
	P-sup	U14	9112	4405	1330	95.87%	475	678.74	671.08
	P-sub	U15	12305	6249	2189	96.13%	698	959.80	960.71