Table 7. T-tests comparing foot proportions.
Two-sample t-tests (prosimians v. anthropoids) | ||||||
Prosimians | Anthropoids | |||||
Variable | mean | var | mean | var | t * | p |
pp4/mt4a | 0.947 | 0.040 | 0.516 | 0.003 | 27.481 | <0.0001 |
mt1/mt2 | 0.977 | 0.010 | 0.600 | 0.003 | 31.942 | <0.0001 |
mt3/mt4 | 1.021 | 0.001 | 0.948 | 0.001 | 14.831 | <0.0001 |
mt4/mt5 | 1.074 | 0.002 | 1.056 | 0.001 | 2.447 | 0.0343 |
Results of two-sample t-tests comparing extant primate pedal proportions and t-tests comparing those of Notharctus tenebrosus (AMNH 143612/143640) and Darwinius to extant primate groups. For the fossil analyses, the smallest absolute t-value indicates which extant group the fossil is most similar to. Comparisons are considered significant at the Bonferroni adjusted alpha of 0.0125.
*t-statistic has been adjusted for comparison of distributions with unequal variance.
Abbreviations: Mt, metatarsal; proximal phalanx; ip, intermediate phalanx.
For comparisons of Darwinius ratios involving mt4, both the reported and estimated values were analyzed (See Materials and Methods and Appendix S1). Therefore, the results of comparisons of the reported values are placed before the ‘/’ while those of the estimated values follow.