Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 8;59(3):2625–2635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.077

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

L-curve for ℓ1-regularized QSM results for a young subject. X-axis: data consistency term ||δF−1 DF χ||2 in regularized reconstruction for varying values of the smoothing parameter λ. Y-axis: regularization term ||G χ||1. Setting λ = 5·10−5 yielded an under-regularized susceptibility map with ringing artifacts (a), whereas using λ = 10−3 resulted an over-regularized reconstruction (c). For λ = 2·10−4, the operating point with the largest curvature on the L-curve was obtained (b). This setting was used for the reported ℓ1-regularized results.