Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 10;59(3):2452–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.105

Table 4.

Intraclass correlation coefficients with isthmus cingulate seed. For easy comparison, regions are ordered according to the strength of correlation in the left hemisphere of the control group (see Table 2) for the other sub-tables. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from visit 1 and visit 2 data from all subjects within each group. Significance is indicated by associated p-values (null hypothesis: ICC = 0).

CONTROL
LEFT HEMISPHERE
RIGHT HEMISPHERE
Region name ICC p Region name ICC p
Medial Orbitofrontal 0.25 0.28 Medial Orbitofrontal 0.66 < 0.001
Rostral Anterior Cingulate 0.36 0.10 Rostral Anterior Cingulate 0.50 0.02
Frontal Pole 0.32 0.16 Frontal Pole 0.45 0.03
Inferior Parietal 0.12 0.61 Inferior Parietal 0.28 0.22
Superior Frontal 0.27 0.24 Superior Frontal 0.52 0.01
Cuneus 0.43 0.04 Cuneus 0.01 0.89
Hippocampus 0.24 0.29 Hippocampus 0.19 0.42
PRE-HD
LEFT HEMISPHERE
RIGHT HEMISPHERE
Region name ICC p Region name ICC p
Medial Orbitofrontal 0.17 0.49 Medial Orbitofrontal 0.50 < 0.01
Rostral Anterior Cingulate 0.26 0.21 Rostral Anterior Cingulate 0.27 0.18
Frontal Pole 0.52 < 0.01 Frontal Pole 0.35 0.07
Inferior Parietal 0.23 0.28 Inferior Parietal 0.37 0.04
Superior Frontal 0.01 > 0.99 Superior Frontal 0.12 0.70
Cuneus 0.23 0.30 Cuneus 0.26 0.20
Hippocampus 0.07 0.91 Hippocampus 0.12 0.72