Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 31;470(2):525–534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2050-4

Table 4.

Failure (clinical or radiographic) based on lesion size

Study/year/design Technique Hips Small (<15%) Medium (15%–30%) Large (>30%)
Hips Failures Hips Failures Hips Failures
Yoon et al. [63] (2001) (R) CD 39 14 2 (14.3%) 7 4 (57.1%) 19 16 (84.2%)
Steinberg et al. [52] (2001) (P) CD/NVG/EStim 312 14% 48% 42%
Israelite et al. [19] (2005) (R) UCD 124 14% 48% 42%
BCD 152
Mont et al. [38] (2004) (R) CD/SD 45 12 7
Yoo et al. [61] (2008) (R) VFG 124 27 0 (0%) 38 3 (7.89%) 59 10 (16.9%)
Kawate et al. [20] (2007) (R) FVFG 71 19 10 (52.6%) 15 11 (73.3%)
Berend et al. [5] (2003)* (R) FVFG 224 (21.1%) (38.2%) (38.2%)

Mean followup = 4.89 years (minimum followup was used if no mean was provided); * in this study, small was defined as less than 25%; medium as 25% to 50%, and large as greater than 50%; only Stage I and II hips included; in the small and medium-sized groups: six failures in 33 hips (18.2%); P = prospective study; R = retrospective study; CD = core decompression; NVG = nonvascular graft; EStim = electrical stimulation; UCD = unilateral core decompression; BCD = bilateral core decompression; SD = multiple small-diameter drillings; VFG = vascularized fibular graft; FVFG = free vascularized fibular graft.