Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 31;470(2):525–534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2050-4

Table 6.

Failure (clinical or radiographic) based on lesion location

Study/year/design Technique Hips Lesion location
A B C1 C2
Hips Failures Hips Failures Hips Failures Hips Failures
Lieberman et al. [26] (2004) (R) CD/BMP 17 3 0 (0%) 7 1 (14.3%)
Nagoya et al. [39] (2004) (R) VIG 35 17 4 (23.5%) 18 15 (83.3%)
Onodera et al. [40] (2005) (R) TTRO 37 19 9 (47.4%) 18 6 (33.3%)
Atsumi et al. [2] (2006) (R) PRO 35 11 0 (0%) 20 0 (0%) 4 hips, 2 failures*
Seyler et al. [46] (2008) (R) CD/NVG/OP1 39 8 1 (12.5%) 12 5 (41.7%) 12 2 (16.7%) 7 5 (71.4%)
Total 163 22 1 (4.6%) 39 6 (15.4%) 48 15 (31.2%) 43 26 (60.4%)

* Not included in totals; A: ≤ medial 1/3 weightbearing; B: ≤ medial 2/3 weightbearing; C1: > 2/3 not extending to acetabular ridge; C2: > 2/3 extending to acetabular ridge; P = prospective study; R = retrospective study; CD = core decompression; BMP = bone morphogenic protein; VIG = vascularized iliac graft; TTRO = transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy; PRO = posterior rotational osteotomy; NVG/OP-1 = nonvascularized graft enriched with OP-1.