Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 2;470(2):382–387. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2161-y

Table 2.

Reported survival rates and complications of ceramic-on-ceramic THA

Study Number of hips Followup (months)* Survival (%) Level of evidence Reported complications
Lombardi et al. [20] 65 73 (26–108) 95 II Aseptic loosening (1); fracture (1); infection (1)
Hamilton et al. [9] 177 31 (21–49) 98 I Aseptic Loosening (2); dislocation (2); fracture (1); infection (3)
Petsatodis et al. [25] 85 252 84 IV Aseptic loosening of cup (6); aseptic loosening of stem (1)
Lee et al. [18] 88 130 (120–142) 97 IV Fracture (2); noise/squeak (13); impingement/fretting (6); periprosthetic fracture (1); dislocation (1)
Lewis et al. [19] 56 100 (58–121) 97 I Dislocation (1); pain unknown (1)
Capello et al. [3] 380 96 96 I Fracture (2); squeak (3); psoas tendinitis (1); infection (3); periprosthetic fracture (1); aseptic loosening (1)
Iwakiri et al. [12] 82 80 (60–100) 91 IV Fracture (3); dissociation (1); infection (2); dislocation (1); fretting/impingement (1)
Current study 1697 50 (6–96) 98 IV Infection (1); aseptic loosening of cup (8); aseptic loosening of femur (10); aseptic loosening of both cup and femur (3); squeaking (4); fracture (1); liner (impingement, subluxation, wear) (11)

* Values are expressed as mean, with range in parentheses.