Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;78(2):334–345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06678-11

Table 2.

Nucleotide changes in different regions based on comparisons of individual sequences and cloning

Cell category and site Host No. of cells No. of sequences No. of nucleotide changesb
ITS1 ITS2 LSU Total
Variability between individual parasite cells
    U.S. Atlantic coast Favella panamensis 17 17 3 2 1 6
    Villefranche-sur-Mer, France Favella markusovszkyi 3 3 0 2 3 5
    Masan Bay, Republic of Korea Favella panamensis 4 4 1 1 1 3
    Villefranche-sur-Mer, France Tintinnopsis sp. 2 2 4 3 0 7
    Rhode River, MD T. cf. subacuta 4 4 6 9 4 19
    Rhode River, MD Tintinnopsis sp. 4 4 5 6 5 16
    Assawoman Bay, MD Favellaarcuata 4 14 1 6 3 10
    Rhode River, MD Eutintinnus tenuis 5 35 15 (5) 10 (5) 3 28 (10)
    Annapolis harbor, MD Eutintinnus pectinis 2 27 8 (4) 9 (3) 0 17 (7)
Variability within individual parasite cells
    Assawoman Bay Favella arcuata 1 6a 1 6 2 9
    Assawoman Bay Favella arcuata 1 6a 0 1 2 3
    Rhode River T. cf. subacuta 1 24a 1 0 3 4
    Rhode River Eutintinnus tenuis 1 24a 12 (4) 8 (4) 3 20 (4)
    Annapolis Harbor Eutintinnus pectinis 1 22a 3 (2) 9 (2) 0 12 (4)
a

Number of clones sequenced.

b

Numbers in parentheses represent inferred insertions and deletions in the alignment.