Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;56(1):197–201. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05559-11

Table 2.

GCV, FOS, and CDV susceptibility phenotypes of pol mutants

BAC Virus UL54 pol genotype
Ganciclovir
Foscarnet
Cidofovir
Mutationa Otherb EC50c SDd Ne EC50 ratiof (fold change) EC50 SD N EC50 ratio (fold change) EC50 SD N EC50 ratio (fold change)
Controls
T2211 S897L 1.11 0.18 96 39 12 106 0.21 0.07 129
    BA31 T3265 FRT, S897L 1.08 0.32 121 39 11 114 0.20 0.06 101
Newly phenotyped recombinants
    BA143 T3525 P744T FRT, S897L 0.96 0.24 10 0.9 43 7 10 1.1 0.21 0.06 7 1.1
    BA189 T3658 E756D FRT, S897L 1.20 0.22 21 1.1 107 14 9 2.7 0.22 0.07 12 1.1
T2483 M844T 1.59 0.52 16 1.4 96 22 16 2.5 0.28 0.10 10 1.3
T2785 M844T C592G (UL97) 2.75 0.89 19 2.5 79 18 18 2.0 0.25 0.04 9 1.2
    BA187 T3652 M844V FRT, S897L 2.50 0.54 11 2.3 84 27 12 2.2 0.32 0.08 22 1.6
a

Mutation transferred into baseline strain or clone.

b

Other pol sequence changes from strain AD169 or UL97 change in case of T2785. FRT, FLP recombinase recognition sequence used for BAC mutagenesis.

c

Mean drug concentration (μM) required to reduce SEAP growth by 50% at 6 to7 days postinfection. Values in bold indicate drug resistance (EC50 > 1.9 times of control value).

d

Standard deviation of the EC50 values.

e

N, number of assays (replicates performed over at least 4 independent assay setups).

f

Ratio of EC50 to that of matching baseline strain.