Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;56(1):258–270. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05005-11

Table 2.

Concentrations of ceftaroline and NXL104 at trough values associated with microbiological success and resistance suppression or treatment failure for several bacterial strains

Regimen Trough (mg/liter)a
Outcome
CPT NXL104
K. pneumoniae 27-908M bearing KPC-2b
    NXL104 AUC = 192, q24h 3.2 0.12 Fail
    NXL104 AUC = 96, q12h 3.2 1.4-1.5 Fail
    NXL104 AUC = 64, q8h 3.2 2.5-2.9 Succeed
K. pneumoniae 24-1318A bearing CTX-M-15c
    NXL104 AUC = 32, q8h 3.2 1.1-1.2 Succeed
    NXL104 AUC = 108, q12h 2.2 1.3-1.4 Succeedd
E. cloacae 2-77C bearing stably derepressed AmpCe
    NXL104 AUC = 192, q24h 3.2 0.16 Fail
    NXL104 AUC = 96, q12h 3.2 1.5-1.6 Fail
    NXL104 AUC = 64, q8h 3.2 2.9-3.4 Succeed
a

The ceftaroline (CPT) trough values indicated are nominal values. The actual values (measured at h 7) were always higher. The NXL104 concentrations were the result of modeling all the data for each regimen and simulating the 8-h NXL104 concentrations for the first 24 h.

b

The MICs using serial dilutions of CPT and NXL104 fixed at 4 mg/liter were 0.75/4.0 mg/liter; the MICs using serial dilutions of both agents were 0.75/4.0 mg/liter.

c

The MICs using serial dilutions of CPT and NXL104 fixed at 4 mg/liter were 0.12/4.0 mg/liter; the MICs using serial dilutions of both agents were 1.0/0.5 mg/liter.

d

This regimen was CPT at 900 mg, q12h, and NXL104 at 900 mg, q12h.

e

The MICs using serial dilutions of CPT and NXL104 fixed at 4 mg/liter were 0.75/4.0 mg/liter; the MICs using serial dilutions of both agents were 2.0/1.0 mg/liter.