Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Oct 28;58(3):334–343. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23385

Table I.

Evolution of Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment
Modality
Decade Historic Treatment Modalities
Used in Contemporary Therapy
1960 1970 1980 1990 Post-2000
Chemotherapy Agents
  • Antimetabolites (methotrexate, mercaptopurine), asparaginase, corticosteroids and vinca alkaloids used in combination

  • Early use of cyclophosphamide

  • Widespread use of induction/consolidation/maintenance strategy

  • Increased use of anthracyclines for high risk patients

  • Asparaginase intensification within DFCI consortium

  • Epipodophyllotoxins abandoned for most children with ALL

  • No widely used new agents.

  • Introduction of imatinib for small subset of patients with Philadelphia positive ALL

  • Nelarabine introduced for T-cell ALL

  • Dexamethasone more widely used in induction therapy

  • Additional refinement of risk based therapy

  • No new agents added to initial therapeutic modalities

  • Prednisone

  • Vincristine

  • Daunomycin/Doxorubicin

  • Cyclophosphamide

  • L-Asparaginase

  • Methotrexate

  • Mercaptopurine

Dose-Intensity/Duration
  • Modest dose intensity

  • Long maintenance therapy(3 to 5 years)

  • Intensity of drugs increased based on early BFM trials showing benefit of delayed intensification for all subsets of ALL patients

  • Further intensification for high risk children.

  • Use of “double DI”

  • Duration of therapy constant

  • Focus on stratification and application of intensified regimens to more limited subsets

  • Intensity of therapy remains constant

  • Duration continues to be constant

  • Induction

  • Consolidation

  • Delayed intensification

  • Maintenance

    • 2 years for girls

    • 2.5 years for boys

Radiation Therapy
  • Early use of cranial and craniospinal irradiation

  • Trials of extended field irradiation.

  • Reduced use of spinal irradiation

  • Randomized trials show efficacy of CNS chemoprophylaxis.

  • Reduced use of radiation therapy for SR children who are CNS negative

  • Further reduction in use of preventive irradiation.

  • High risk patients no longer routinely irradiated.

  • Dose remains constant at 18 Gy for prophylaxis; reduced doses investigated for T-cell ALL and CNS relapse

  • Further reduction in indications for radiation therapy.

  • Cranial irradiation limited to CNS disease refractory to systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy

ALL – acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BFM – Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster; CNS – central nervous system; DFCI – Dana Farber Cancer Institute; DI – delayed intensification