Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 10;22(2):363–371. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr112

Table 2.

Results of Experiment 3 (N = 11)

Nonselective trials Selective trials
RMT (%) 56.0 ± 4.6 56.0 ± 4.6
Experimental intensity (%) 62.7 ± 3.6 62.7 ± 3.6
Mean stimulation time (ms) 478 ± 62 451 ± 93
Behavior with TMS
    Accuracy on Go trials (%)* 95.6 ± 3.2 89.9 ± 4.2
    Probability of stopping (%) 54.6 ± 6.6 45.2 ± 10.8
    Direction error rate (%) N/A 4.6 ± 2.8
    RT on Go trials (ms) 518 ± 47 529 ± 39
    Mean SSD (ms) 257 ± 61 239 ± 107
    SSRT (ms) 246 ± 38 271 ± 100
    RT of continuing response (ms) N/A 663 ± 57
    Stopping Interference Effect (ms) N/A 134 ± 60
Raw motor-evoked potential amplitude
    Correct Go trials (μV) 648 ± 380 660 ± 389
    Successful Stop trials (μV) 596 ± 367 694 ± 382
    Failed Stop trials (μV) 675 ± 364 700 ± 389
    Intertrial interval (μV) 599 ± 397 599 ± 397
Percent Leg Modulation (%)* −8.0 ± 10.1 6.8 ± 17.3
    At 200 ms (%)* −11.9 ± 18.3 3.6 ± 12.1
    At 220 ms (%)* −16.1 ± 11.8 9.8 ± 23.2
    At 240 ms (%) 2.5 ± 21.1 0.9 ± 28.0

Note: All values given as mean ± standard deviation.

*

Significantly different between conditions (P < 0.05).