Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;50(1):7–15. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05267-11

Table 5.

Results of meta-analyses for diagnostic accuracy of PJP and IFIa with serum 1,3-β-d-glucan

Test No. of studies % sensitivity (95% CI) % specificity (95% CI) % Diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI) AUC-SROC (95% CI)
PJP
    All data 12 96 (92–98) 84 (83–86) 102.3 (59.2–176.6) 0.96 (0.94–0.99)
        Healthy control excluded 12 96 (92–98) 84 (82–86) 99.8 (57.8–172.4) 0.96 (0.94–0.99)
    Effect of HIV status
        HIV-positive patients 5 95 (90–98) 85 (82–88) 117.3 (55.0–250.4) 0.97 (0.95–0.99)
        HIV-negative patients 5 97 (83–100) 83 (81–85) 50.3 (15.0–169.4) 0.93 (0.80–1.00)
    Effect of study design
        Cohort study 3 100 (59–100) 78 (73–83) 20.1 (3.4–117.8) 0.91 (0.74–1.00)
        Case-control study 9 95 (92–98) 85 (84–87) 121.4 (68.4–215.6) 0.97 (0.95–0.99)
    Effect of assay type
        Fungitell 5 98 (93–100) 83 (81–85) 139.2 (44.5–435.5) 0.96 (0.88–1.00)
        Fungitec G test 4 94 (89–98) 88 (85–90) 117.8 (53.8–258.3) 0.97 (0.94–0.99)
    Only paper in English included 10 95 (92–98) 85 (83–87) 112.8 (64.1–198.4) 0.96 (0.94–0.99)
    Effect of methodological quality (representative spectrum)
        Yes (no bias) 8 95 (92–98) 84 (83–86) 100.5 (55.9–180.6) 0.86 (0.61–1.00)
        No (potential bias) 4 97 (86–100) 84 (80–88) 115.2 (25.6–517.0) 0.97 (0.93–1.00)
IFI
    All data 31 80 (77–82) 82 (81–83) 25.7 (15.0–44.1) 0.88 (0.82–0.93)
        Healthy control excluded 28 78 (75–81) 80 (79–82) 19.2 (11.0–33.7) 0.86 (0.81–0.92)
        Per event excluded 26 80 (77–83) 82 (80–83) 25.3 (14.0–45.8) 0.90 (0.86–0.95)
        Possible IFI in control excluded 28 81 (78–83) 82 (81–84) 30.7 (16.4–57.5) 0.89 (0.83–0.94)
    Effect of study design
        Cohort study 17 72 (67–77) 78 (76–80) 12.3 (6.0–25.1) 0.79 (0.73–0.85)
        Case-control study 14 83 (80–86) 86 (84–88) 68.3 (30.7–151.8) 0.95 (0.92–0.98)
    Effect of reference standard
        EORTC/MSG 17 77 (70–78) 83 (81–84) 15.2 (8.5–27.3) 0.80 (0.73–0.86)
        Similar criteria 14 86 (82–90) 81 (79–83) 61.4 (20.3–185.5) 0.95 (0.90–0.99)
    Effect of assay type
        Fungitell 15 75 (71–79) 77 (75–79) 12.0 (6.1–23.7) 0.86 (0.79–0.93)
        Fungitec G test 7 89 (83–93) 90 (88–92) 100.7 (23.2–437.6) 0.96 (0.96–1.00)
        Wako 5 84 (77–90) 90 (87–92) 60.1 (11.2–321.3) 0.94 (0.86–1.00)
    Effect of kind of mycosis
        Candidiasis 19 81 (77–85) 81 (80–83) 25.7 (12.9–51.2) 0.90 (0.85–0.95)
        Aspergillosis 17 77 (71–82) 83 (82–85) 23.2 (9.9–54.4) 0.86 (0.77–0.94)
    Effect of antifungal therapy 12 81 (77–85) 84 (82–85) 25.9 (10.0–66.8) 0.87 (0.78–0.96)
    Only papers in English included 23 79 (76–82) 83 (82–84) 26.8 (13.9–51.5) 0.87 (0.80–0.95)
    Effect of methodological quality (representative spectrum)
        Yes (no bias) 18 71 (66–76) 80 (78–81) 11.8 (6.4–21.9) 0.78 (0.71–0.85)
        No (potential bias) 13 85 (82–88) 87 (85–89) 89.3 (36.4–219.1) 0.96 (0.93–0.98)
a

PJP, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IFI, invasive fungal infection; EORTC/MSG, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria.