TABLE 2.
Sequence identities between mature proteins from different species of CXCL10 and CXCL9
| Protein 1a,b | Protein 2a,b | Pairwise scorec |
|---|---|---|
| % | ||
| hum10 (77 AA) | mou10 (77 AA) | 70 |
| hum10 (77 AA) | cyn10 (77 AA) | 96 |
| hum10 (77 AA) | rat10 (77 AA) | 72 |
| hum10 (77 AA) | rab10 (77 AA) | 83 |
| mou10 (77 AA) | cyn10 (77 AA) | 68 |
| mou10 (77 AA) | rat10 (77 AA) | 77 |
| mou10 (77 AA) | rab10 (77 AA) | 63 |
| cyn10 (77 AA) | rat10 (77 AA) | 74 |
| cyn10 (77 AA) | rab10 (77 AA) | 81 |
| rat10 (77 AA) | rab10 (77 AA) | 64 |
| hum9 (103 AA) | mou9 (105 AA) | 65 |
| hum9 (103 AA) | cyn9 (103 AA) | 91 |
| mou9 (105 AA) | cyn9 (103 AA) | 62 |
a The following abbreviations are used: hum10, human CXCL10; mou10, mouse CXCL10; cyn10, cynomolgus CXCL10; rat10, rat CXCL10; rab10, rabbit CXCL10; hum9, human CXCL9; mou9, mouse CXCL9; cyn9, cynomolgus CXCL9.
b The number of amino acid (AA) residues were compared.
c A pairwise score was calculated as the number of identical amino acids of the best alignment divided by the number of residues compared for each pair.