Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2009 Mar 6;20(10):1735–1747. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0871-8

Table 2.

Upper gastrointestinal event rates by agent and relative safety of weekly risedronate compared with weekly alendronate

Outcome of Interest Alendronate
Risedronate
Hazard ratio (95%CI)
Events, n Ratea Events, n Ratea Unadjusted P value Adjustedb P value
Hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleed 16 0.84 15 1.00 1.19 (0.59–2.40) 0.63 1.12 (0.55–2.28) 0.76
Upper gastrointestinal disease 612 34.26 508 36.10 1.05 (0.94–1.19) 0.39 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.41
Upper gastrointestinal symptom 662 37.26 516 36.70 0.99 (0.88–1.11) 0.80 0.96 (0.85–1.07) 0.45
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy 134 7.13 90 6.05 0.85 (0.65–1.11) 0.23 0.82 (0.62–1.07) 0.142
Gastroprotective treatment 1,843 130.45 1,588 146.60 1.11 (1.04–1.19) 0.002 0.98 (0.92–1.05) 0.65
Switched between therapies 111 5.89 60 4.02 0.68 (0.50–0.93) 0.02 0.67 (0.49–0.92) 0.01
Any upper gastrointestinal diagnosis or procedure 1,058 62.31 867 64.87 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 0.39 0.98 (0.89–1.07) 0.61
Any upper gastrointestinal diagnosis or procedure, or gastroprotective treatment 2,263 170.71 1,920 189.90 1.10 (1.03–1.17) 0.003 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.75

Patients were censored on the date of death or 120 days after treatment initiation

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio

a

Rate per 100 person-years of follow-up

b

Adjusted for risedronate propensity score quintiles as four dummy variables