Table 4.

Triad types, their average choice scores by language, Chi square results, and Regression analysis results for the language contrast.

Triad type	TARGET: choices	English Mean (SD)	Korean Mean (SD)	Wald chi square	p-value	R^2
TARGET: Tight or Loose Containment
TT 1	T-INa: l-inb vs. l-on	4.90 (1.05)	4.68 (1.20)	1.35	p = 0.246	0.009
TT 2	L-IN: t-in vs. t-on	4.78 (1.15)	4.58 (1.17)	1.10	p = 0.298	0.007
TT 3	T-IN: t-in vs. t-on	4.01 (1.05)	3.91 (1.10)	0.36	p = 0.546	0.002
TT 4	L-IN: l-in vs. l-on	4.77 (1.17)	4.48 (1.29)	2.21	p = 0.147	0.013
TT 5	L-IN: l-in vs. t-in	3.89 (1.31)	4.24 (1.11)	2.99	p = 0.084	0.021
TT 6	T-IN: t-in vs. l-in	4.63 (1.16)	5.05 (1.07)	5.64	p = 0.018	0.035
TT 7	T-IN: t-on vs. l-on	4.99 (0.89)	4.97 (1.13)	0.01	p = 0.938	0.000
TT 8c	L-IN: t-in vs. l-on	3.63 (1.48)	2.83 (1.41)	11.07	p < 0.001	0.071
TT 9c	T-IN: l-in vs. t-on	2.90 (1.36)	1.72 (1.42)	22.25	p < 0.001	0.143
TARGET: Loose Support
TT 10	L-ON: l-on vs. t-on	4.30 (1.84)	4.60 (1.24)	3.22	p = 0.073	0.021
TT 11	L-ON: t-on vs. t-in	3.00 (1.39)	2.64 (1.09)	3.05	p = 0.081	0.021
TT 12	L-ON: t-on vs. l-in	2.46 (1.31)	2.07 (1.39)	3.02	p = 0.082	0.021
TT 13	L-ON: l-on vs. l-in	3.61 (1.36)	3.46 (1.36)	0.47	p = 0.497	0.003
TARGET: Tight Support
TT 14	T-ON: t-on vs. l-on	4.43 (1.04)	4.60 (1.18)	0.77	p = 0.380	0.006
TT 15c	T-ON: t-in vs. l-in	4.41 (1.29)	5.10 (1.09)	11.42	p = 0.001	0.075
TT 16d	T-ON: t-in vs. l-on	4.40 (1.20)	4.96 (1.02)	8.97	p = 0.003+	0.060
TT 17c	T-ON: t-on vs. t-in	3.74 (1.00)	3.08 (1.20)	12.80	p < 0.001	0.082
TT 18c	T-ON: l-on vs. l-in	3.77 (1.34)	2.83 (1.39)	17.60	p < 0.001	0.105

^aL-IN: loose containment; T-IN: tight containment; L-ON: loose support; T-ON: tight support.

^bBetween the two choices, the bold-faced relation received a score of 1 when it was chosen. There were a total of six trials for each Triad Type. Therefore, the maximum score a participant would get for a given triad type was 6.

^cCrosslinguistic difference is significant, p<0.0028.

^dCrosslinguistic difference closely approached significance.